Gray v. CSP-Sacramento et al
Filing
13
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 9/6/19 ADOPTING 8 Findings and Recommendations in full; All claims against defendant CSP-Sacramento are DISMISSED without leave to amend. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
BERNARDOS GRAY, JR.,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
No. 2:17-cv-0213 WBS AC P
v.
ORDER
CSP-SACRAMENTO, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action
18
seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
19
Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On July 15, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which
21
were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings
22
and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 8. Plaintiff has not filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations.
24
Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the findings and
25
recommendations was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to
26
keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service
27
of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective.
28
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
1
1
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
2
ORDERED that:
3
4
5
6
1. The findings and recommendations filed July 15, 2019 (ECF No. 8), are adopted in
full; and
2. All claims against defendant CSP-Sacramento are dismissed without leave to amend.
Dated: September 6, 2019
7
8
9
10
11
Gray0213.800
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?