Gray v. CSP-Sacramento et al

Filing 19

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 10/29/19 ADOPTING in full 18 Findings and Recommendations and DISMISSING this action without prejudice for failure to prosecute. CASE CLOSED(Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BERNARDOS GRAY, JR., 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. No. 2:17-cv-0213 WBS AC P ORDER CSP-SACRAMENTO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 18 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 19 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On October 8, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 18. Plaintiff has 23 not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 27 28 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 8, 2019 (ECF No. 18), are adopted in full; and 1 1 2 2. This action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. See L.R. 183(b). Dated: October 29, 2019 3 4 5 Gray0213.800 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?