Woodcox, et al. v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc., et al.

Filing 11

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 2/16/17 ORDERING that Defendants shall not be required to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint in this action until after the Court has ruled on the pending Motion to Remand (Dkt. 5 ) and the Motion to Stay (Dkt. 6 ).(Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 PAMELA WOODCOX, EUGENE 6 WOODCOX, MICHELLE CONTRERAS and LOUIS CONTRERAS , 7 Plaintiffs, 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) v. ) ) ) VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, ) ) INC., D/B/A VOLKSWAGEN OF AMERICA, INC., VOLKSWAGEN AG, ) ROSEVILLE VOLKSWAGEN, LLC, THE ) ) NIELLO COMPANY, and DOES 1 ) through 50, inclusive , ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) 16 19 ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT Judge: Hon. William B. Shubb Courtroom: 5, 14th Floor Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Stipulation to Extend Time for 17 18 Case No. 2:17-cv-00215-WBSDB Defendants to Respond to Initial Complaint. For good cause shown, the Joint Stipulation is GRANTED. 20 1. Defendants shall not be required to answer or otherwise 21 respond to the complaint in this action until after the Court has ruled on the 22 pending Motion to Remand (Dkt. 5) and the Motion to Stay (Dkt. 6); 23 24 25 26 27 2. If this action is not stayed, remanded, or transferred, Defendants shall have 30 days following the Court’s orders on the pending Motion to Remand and the Motion to Stay to answer, move, plead or otherwise respond to the complaint. 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME CASE NO. 2:17-CV-00215-WBS-DB 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 3 Dated: February 16, 2017 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME CASE NO. 2:17-CV-00215-WBS-DB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?