Odom v. Adams

Filing 24

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/18/18 GRANTING 23 Request to lift the stay and granting 22 , 23 Motion for Extension of time. Within 30 days of service of this order, petitioner shall file an amended petition. The Clerk of the Court is directed to re-open this case. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RYAN BIGOSKI ODOM, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 No. 2:17-cv-0233 JAM AC P v. ORDER D.G. ADAMS, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se on a petition for a writ of habeas corpus 18 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On November 2, 2017, the court issued a stay in this matter and 19 administratively closed the case while petitioner returned to the state court to exhaust additional 20 claims. ECF No. 15. Petitioner was required to notify this court within thirty days of a decision 21 by the state’s highest court exhausting her new claims. Id. at 2. At the same time, she was to file 22 an amended petition and a request to lift the stay. Id. Petitioner has now filed a notice stating 23 that the California Supreme Court denied her petition on November 14, 2018, and requests that 24 the stay be lifted and she be given an additional thirty days to file an amended petition. ECF Nos. 25 22, 23. 26 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 27 1. The Clerk of the Court is directed to re-open this case. 28 2. Petitioner’s request to lift the stay (ECF No. 23) is granted and the stay is lifted. 1 1 3. Petitioner’s requests for an additional thirty days to file an amended petition (ECF 2 Nos. 22, 23) are granted. Within thirty days of service of this order, petitioner shall file an 3 amended petition. If petitioner does not file an amended petition, the case will proceed on the 4 original petition. 5 DATED: December 18, 2018 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?