Diaz v. CDCR et al

Filing 12

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/13/2017 DISMISSING this action without prejudice. CASE CLOSED.(Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JORGE DIAZ, 12 13 14 No. 2:17-cv-0235 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER DR. GRIFFITH, D.O., et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff consented to proceed before the undersigned for all purposes. See 28 U.S.C. 18 § 636(c). By order filed August 30, 2017, plaintiff’s amended complaint was dismissed and thirty 19 days leave to file a second amended complaint was granted. Thirty days from that date have now 20 passed, and plaintiff has not filed a second amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the 21 court’s order. 22 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. 23 See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 24 Dated: October 13, 2017 25 26 27 /diaz0235.fta 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?