Diaz v. CDCR et al

Filing 12

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/13/2017 DISMISSING this action without prejudice. CASE CLOSED.(Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JORGE DIAZ,

12
13
14

No. 2:17-cv-0235 KJN P
Plaintiff,

v.

ORDER

DR. GRIFFITH, D.O., et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff consented to proceed before the undersigned for all purposes. See 28 U.S.C.

18

§ 636(c). By order filed August 30, 2017, plaintiff’s amended complaint was dismissed and thirty

19

days leave to file a second amended complaint was granted. Thirty days from that date have now

20

passed, and plaintiff has not filed a second amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the

21

court’s order.

22

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice.

23

See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

24

Dated: October 13, 2017

25
26
27
/diaz0235.fta

28
1