Morrow v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
18
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 9/11/2017 ORDERING The deadline for Defendant to file her response to Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is EXTENDED 30 days to 10/11/2017; all other deadlines and scheduling matters set forth in the Court's 2/6/2017 Scheduling Order remain the same. (Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
PHILIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney
DEBORAH LEE STACHEL
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
ELLINOR R. CODER, CSBN 258258
Special Assistant United States Attorney
160 Spear Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (415) 977-8955
Facsimile: (415) 744-0134
E-Mail: Ellinor.Coder@ssa.gov
8
9
Attorneys for Defendant
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
12
13
) Case No.: 2:17-cv-0250-AC
)
) [PROPOSED] ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CARMEN MORROW,
14
Plaintiff,
15
16
17
vs.
NANCY A. BERRHILL,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
18
19
20
21
Having reviewed the Stipulation of the parties and finding good cause, the Court hereby
22
23
24
25
26
APPROVES and ADOPTS the parties’ Joint Stipulation to Extend Briefing Deadlines as the
Order of this Court. The Court hereby EXTENDS the schedule in this matter as follows:
1.
The deadline for Defendant to file her response to Plaintiff’s motion for summary
judgment is extended thirty (30) days to October 11, 2017.
27
28
Stip. and [Proposed] Order to Extend Briefing Schedule; 2:17-cv-0250-AC
1
1
2
3
2.
All other deadlines and scheduling matters set forth in the Court’s February 6,
2017 Scheduling Order remain the same.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 11th day of September, 2017.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stip. and [Proposed] Order to Extend Briefing Schedule; 2:17-cv-0250-AC
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?