Alexander v. Becerra et al

Filing 5

ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 5/22/2017 ORDERING that the Clerk's Office assign a United States District Judge to this case. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KEVAN ALEXANDER, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:17-cv-0257 DB P v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS XAVIER BECERRA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 A recent court order was served on plaintiff’s address of record and returned by the postal 17 18 service. (ECF No. 4.) It appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 183(b), 19 which requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change. 20 More than sixty-three days have passed since the court order was returned by the postal service 21 and plaintiff has failed to notify the Court of a current address. As this court issues findings and 22 recommendation below concerning the petition, the undersigned orders the Clerk’s Office to 23 assign a United States District Judge to this case. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk’s Office assign a United States 24 25 District Judge to this case. Additionally, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 26 27 prejudice for failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 183(b). 28 //// 1 1 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 2 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 3 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 4 with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 5 and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within fourteen 6 days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the 7 specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 8 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 9 Dated: May 22, 2017 10 11 12 13 14 TIM-DLB:10 DB / ORDERS / ORDERS.PRISONER.CIVIL RIGHTS / alex0257.33a 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?