Wright v. Lewis et al
Filing
56
ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/4/2020 ADOPTING 48 Findings and Recommendations in full. Defendants CSP-Sac and the Reasonable Accommodations Panel are DISMISSED. This matter is REFERRED back to the assigned magistrate judge for all further pretrial proceedings. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DANIEL WEBSTER WRIGHT,
12
No. 2:17-cv-260-KJM-EFB P
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
J. LEWIS, et al.,
15
ORDER
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil action. The matter was
17
18
referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local
19
Rule 302.
On July 8, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were
20
21
served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings
22
and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed objections to
23
the findings and recommendations.
The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States,
24
25
602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed
26
de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law
27
by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court
28
/////
1
1
. . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be
2
supported by the record and by the proper analysis.
3
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
4
1. The findings and recommendations filed July 8, 2020, are adopted in full;
5
2. Defendants CSP-Sac and the Reasonable Accommodations Panel are dismissed; and
6
3. This matter is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for all further pretrial
7
proceedings.
8
DATED: September 4, 2020.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?