Oertell v. Six Flags Entertainment Corporation, et al.
Filing
79
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 08/18/17 ORDERING that the hearing on the 67 Motion for Contempt is RESET for 9/1/2017 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DB) before Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes. Parties ordered to file a joint statement by 8/28/2017 at 10:00 a.m. (Benson, A.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MABLE OERTELL,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
No. 2:17-cv-0267 TLN DB
v.
ORDER
SIX FLAGS ENTERTAINMENT
CORPORATION, et al.,
16
Defendants.
17
18
This action came before the court on August 18, 2017, for hearing of plaintiff’s motion for
19
contempt. Attorney Steven Derby appeared in person on behalf of the plaintiff. Attorney Hayley
20
Grunvald appeared in person on behalf of defendants Six Flags Entertainment Corporation; Park
21
Management Corporation; Panda Restaurant Group, Inc., and Kahala Restaurant Holdings LLC.
22
Attorney Jacob Daniels appeared telephonically on behalf of defendant Dippin’ Dots, LLC.
Upon consideration of the arguments on file and those made at the hearing, and for the
23
24
reasons set forth on the record at that hearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The hearing of plaintiff’s motion for contempt (ECF No. 67) is continued to Friday,
25
26
September 1, 2017, at 10:00 a.m., at the United States District Court, 501 I Street, Sacramento,
27
California, in Courtroom No. 27, before the undersigned;
28
////
1
1
2
3
2. The parties shall file a joint statement on or before Monday, August 28, 2017, at 10:00
a.m.; and
3. The parties’ joint statement shall address whether the court’s June 26, 2017 order (ECF
4
No. 62) has been complied with and, if the order has not been complied with, what sanction or
5
sanctions against the defendants are appropriate.
6
Dated: August 18, 2017
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
DLB:6
DB\orders\orders.civil\oertell0267.oah.081817
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?