California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Cemex Construction Materials Pacific, LLC

Filing 17

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 3/17/2018 ORDERING that Plaintiff's claims against CEMEX Construction Materials Pacific, LLC are DISMISSED with prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Fabillaran, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Michael R. Lozeau (State Bar No. 142893) Douglas J. Chermak (State Bar No. 233382) LOZEAU DRURY LLP 410 12th Street, Suite 250 Oakland, CA 94607 Tel: (510) 836-4200 Fax: (510) 836-4205 (fax) E-mail: michael@lozeaudrury.com doug@lozeaudrury.com 6 7 8 Attorneys for Plaintiff THE CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 THE CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE, a non-profit corporation, 13 Plaintiff, 14 15 16 17 18 vs. Case No. 2:17-cv-00272-MCE-CKD STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE [FRCP 41(a)(2)] CEMEX CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS PACIFIC, LLC, a Delaware corporation; Defendant. 19 20 21 22 23 WHEREAS, on July 23, 2014, Plaintiff The California Sportfishing Protection Alliance (“CSPA”) filed its Complaint against Defendant CEMEX Construction Materials Pacific, LLC (“CEMEX”) in this Court, The California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Cemex Construction Materials Pacific, LLC, Case No. 2:17-cv-00272-MCE-CKD, in which Plaintiff alleged violations of 24 the Clean Water Act; 25 WHEREAS, CSPA and CEMEX, through their authorized representatives and without 26 27 28 either adjudication of CSPA’s claims or admission by CEMEX of any alleged violation or other wrongdoing, have chosen to resolve in full by way of settlement the allegations of CSPA as set forth Stipulation and Order to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Claims with Prejudice 1 Case No. 2:17-CV-00272-MCE-CKD 1 2 in the Notice and Complaint, thereby avoiding the costs and uncertainties of further litigation. WHEREAS, the parties submitted a settlement agreement via certified mail, return receipt 3 requested, to the U.S. EPA and the U.S. Department of Justice and the 45-day review period set 4 forth at 40 C.F.R. § 135.5 has completed. The federal agencies have submitted correspondence to 5 the Court indicating that they have no objection to the terms of the settlement agreement; 6 NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed to by and between the 7 parties that CSPA’s claims, as set forth in the Notice and Complaint, be dismissed with prejudice. 8 The parties respectfully request an order from this Court dismissing such claims. 9 Respectfully submitted, 10 11 Dated: February 28, 2018 LOZEAU DRURY LLP 12 By: 13 14 15 _/s/ Douglas J. Chermak____________ Douglas J. Chermak Attorneys for Plaintiff THE CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE 16 MITCHELL CHADWICK LLP 17 /s/ Sarah M. Taylor___ (as authorized on 2/27/18) Sarah M. Taylor Attorneys for Defendant CEMEX CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS PACIFIC, LLC 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation and Order to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Claims with Prejudice 2 Case No. 2:17-CV-00272-MCE-CKD ORDER 1 2 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties and good cause having been shown, it is hereby 3 ordered that Plaintiff The California Sportfishing Protection Alliance’s claims against Defendant 4 CEMEX Construction Materials Pacific, LLC, as set forth in the Notice and Complaint filed in Case 5 No. 2:17-cv-00272-MCE-CKD, are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is 6 directed to close this case. 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 Dated: March 17, 2018 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation and Order to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Claims with Prejudice 3 Case No. 2:17-CV-00272-MCE-CKD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?