California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Cemex Construction Materials Pacific, LLC

Filing 7

ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 7/28/2017 ORDERING Defendant shall have an EXTENSION of time, up to and including 8/28/2017; to file a responsive pleading to 1 Complaint. (Washington, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 MITCHELL CHADWICK LLP PATRICK G. MITCHELL (SBN 124420) SARAH M. TAYLOR (SBN 296520) 3001 Lava Ridge Court, Suite 120 Roseville, CA 95661 Telephone: (916) 462-8888 Facsimile: (916) 788-0290 pmitchell@mitchellchadwick.com staylor@mitchellchadwick.com Attorneys for Defendants CEMEX Construction Materials Pacific, LLC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 THE CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE, a non-profit corporation, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 vs. CEMEX CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS PACIFIC, LLC., a Delaware corporation Defendant. Case No. 2:17-cv-00272-MCE-CKD STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT BY 28 DAYS; ORDER District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney Complaint filed: February 8, 2017 Current response date: July 31, 2017 New response date: August 28, 2017 16 17 WHEREAS, the complaint in this action was filed on February 8, 2017 (“Complaint”) by 18 plaintiff The California Sportfishing Protection Alliance (“Plaintiff”) against defendant CEMEX 19 Construction Materials Pacific, LLC (“Defendant” or “CEMEX”); 20 WHEREAS, Defendant waived service on May 2, 2017; 21 WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rule 144, Plaintiff and Defendant stipulated to extend 22 Defendant’s time to respond to the Complaint by 28 days on June 28, 2017; 23 WHEREAS, Defendant must currently respond to the Complaint by July 31, 2017. 24 WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendant have been engaged in settlement discussions and 25 anticipate reaching settlement in the coming weeks; and 26 WHEREAS, in light of ongoing settlement discussions, the parties believe it to further the 27 interests of judicial economy to extend the time for Defendant to respond to the Complaint by 28 28 1 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT; ORDER CASE NO: 2:17-CV-00272-MCE-CKD 1 2 days. THEREFORE, Plaintiffs and CEMEX hereby stipulate that CEMEX may respond to the 3 Complaint by no later than August 28, 2017. 4 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 5 6 Dated: July 26, 2017 7 MITCHELL CHADWICK LLP By: 8 9 Attorneys for Defendant CEMEX Construction Materials Pacific, LLC. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 /s/ Sarah M. Taylor PATRICK G. MITCHELL SARAH M. TAYLOR Dated: July 26, 2017 LOZEAU DRURY LLP By: /s/ Douglas Chermak (as authorized on July 26, 2017) MICHAEL R. LOZEAU DOUGLAS J. CHERMAK Attorneys for Plaintiff The California Sportfishing Protection Alliance 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT; ORDER CASE NO: 2:17-CV-00272-MCE-CKD ORDER 1 2 Having read and considered the Joint Stipulation for Order Extending Time to 3 Respond to Initial Complaint of CEMEX CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS PACIFIC, LLC 4 (“Defendant”) and THE CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE 5 (“Plaintiff”), and good cause appearing therefore, 6 IT IS ORDERED that the application is GRANTED, as follows: 7 Defendant shall have an extension of time, up to and including August 28, 2017, to file a 8 responsive pleading to Plaintiff’s initial complaint. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 28, 2017 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT; ORDER CASE NO: 2:17-CV-00272-MCE-CKD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?