California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Cemex Construction Materials Pacific, LLC
Filing
9
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 08/28/17 ORDERING that the due date of defendant's responsive pleading to Plaintiff's initial complaint is EXTENDED to 10/27/17. (Benson, A.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
MITCHELL CHADWICK LLP
PATRICK G. MITCHELL (SBN 124420)
SARAH M. TAYLOR (SBN 296520)
3001 Lava Ridge Court, Suite 120
Roseville, CA 95661
Telephone: (916) 462-8888
Facsimile: (916) 788-0290
pmitchell@mitchellchadwick.com
staylor@mitchellchadwick.com
Attorneys for Defendants
CEMEX Construction Materials Pacific, LLC
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
THE CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING
PROTECTION ALLIANCE, a non-profit
corporation,
13
14
15
16
17
Plaintiff,
Case No. 2:17-cv-00272-MCE-CKD
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND
TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL
COMPLAINT BY 60 ADDITIONAL
DAYS; ORDER
vs.
CEMEX CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS
PACIFIC, LLC., a Delaware corporation
Defendant.
18
District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.
Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney
Complaint filed: February 8, 2017
Current response date: August 28, 2017
New response date: October 27, 2017
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
WHEREAS, the complaint in this action was filed on February 8, 2017 (“Complaint”) by
plaintiff The California Sportfishing Protection Alliance (“Plaintiff”) against defendant CEMEX
Construction Materials Pacific, LLC (“Defendant”);
WHEREAS, Defendant waived service on May 2, 2017;
WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rule 144, Plaintiff and Defendant stipulated to extend
Defendant’s time to respond to the Complaint by 28 days on June 28, 2017;
WHEREAS, Judge England granted the Parties’ Stipulation for Order Extending Time on
27
28
1
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT AND ORDER
CASE NO: 2:17-CV-00272-MCE-CKD
1
July 31, 2017;
2
WHEREAS, Defendant must currently respond to the Complaint by August 28, 2017;
3
WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendant have agreed on material terms of settlement and are
4
in the process of drafting the written settlement agreement;
5
WHEREAS, in light of ongoing settlement discussions, the parties believe it to further the
6
interests of judicial economy to extend the time for Defendant to respond to the Complaint by 60
7
days; and
8
9
10
THEREFORE, Plaintiff and Defendant hereby stipulate that Defendant may respond to
the Complaint by no later than October 27, 2017.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
11
12
Dated: August 23, 2017
MITCHELL CHADWICK LLP
By:
13
14
15
/s/ Patrick G. Mitchell
PATRICK G. MITCHELL
SARAH M. TAYLOR
Attorneys for Defendant
CEMEX Construction Materials Pacific,
LLC.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Dated: August 23, 2017
LOZEAU DRURY LLP
By:
/s/ Douglas J. Chermak (as authorized on
August 23, 2017)
MICHAEL R. LOZEAU
DOUGLAS J. CHERMAK
Attorneys for Plaintiff
The California Sportfishing Protection
Alliance
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT AND ORDER
CASE NO: 2:17-CV-00272-MCE-CKD
ORDER
1
2
Having read and considered the Joint Stipulation for Order Extending Time to
3
Respond to Initial Complaint of CEMEX CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS PACIFIC, LLC
4
(“Defendant”) and THE CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE
5
(“Plaintiff”), and good cause appearing therefore,
6
IT IS SO ORDERED that the stipulation is granted as follows:
7
Defendant shall have an extension of time, up to and including October 27, 2017, to file a
8
responsive pleading to Plaintiff’s initial complaint.
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 28, 2017
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT AND ORDER
CASE NO: 2:17-CV-00272-MCE-CKD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?