California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Cemex Construction Materials Pacific, LLC

Filing 9

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 08/28/17 ORDERING that the due date of defendant's responsive pleading to Plaintiff's initial complaint is EXTENDED to 10/27/17. (Benson, A.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 MITCHELL CHADWICK LLP PATRICK G. MITCHELL (SBN 124420) SARAH M. TAYLOR (SBN 296520) 3001 Lava Ridge Court, Suite 120 Roseville, CA 95661 Telephone: (916) 462-8888 Facsimile: (916) 788-0290 pmitchell@mitchellchadwick.com staylor@mitchellchadwick.com Attorneys for Defendants CEMEX Construction Materials Pacific, LLC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 THE CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE, a non-profit corporation, 13 14 15 16 17 Plaintiff, Case No. 2:17-cv-00272-MCE-CKD JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT BY 60 ADDITIONAL DAYS; ORDER vs. CEMEX CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS PACIFIC, LLC., a Delaware corporation Defendant. 18 District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney Complaint filed: February 8, 2017 Current response date: August 28, 2017 New response date: October 27, 2017 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 WHEREAS, the complaint in this action was filed on February 8, 2017 (“Complaint”) by plaintiff The California Sportfishing Protection Alliance (“Plaintiff”) against defendant CEMEX Construction Materials Pacific, LLC (“Defendant”); WHEREAS, Defendant waived service on May 2, 2017; WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rule 144, Plaintiff and Defendant stipulated to extend Defendant’s time to respond to the Complaint by 28 days on June 28, 2017; WHEREAS, Judge England granted the Parties’ Stipulation for Order Extending Time on 27 28 1 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT AND ORDER CASE NO: 2:17-CV-00272-MCE-CKD 1 July 31, 2017; 2 WHEREAS, Defendant must currently respond to the Complaint by August 28, 2017; 3 WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendant have agreed on material terms of settlement and are 4 in the process of drafting the written settlement agreement; 5 WHEREAS, in light of ongoing settlement discussions, the parties believe it to further the 6 interests of judicial economy to extend the time for Defendant to respond to the Complaint by 60 7 days; and 8 9 10 THEREFORE, Plaintiff and Defendant hereby stipulate that Defendant may respond to the Complaint by no later than October 27, 2017. IT IS SO STIPULATED. 11 12 Dated: August 23, 2017 MITCHELL CHADWICK LLP By: 13 14 15 /s/ Patrick G. Mitchell PATRICK G. MITCHELL SARAH M. TAYLOR Attorneys for Defendant CEMEX Construction Materials Pacific, LLC. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Dated: August 23, 2017 LOZEAU DRURY LLP By: /s/ Douglas J. Chermak (as authorized on August 23, 2017) MICHAEL R. LOZEAU DOUGLAS J. CHERMAK Attorneys for Plaintiff The California Sportfishing Protection Alliance 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT AND ORDER CASE NO: 2:17-CV-00272-MCE-CKD ORDER 1 2 Having read and considered the Joint Stipulation for Order Extending Time to 3 Respond to Initial Complaint of CEMEX CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS PACIFIC, LLC 4 (“Defendant”) and THE CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE 5 (“Plaintiff”), and good cause appearing therefore, 6 IT IS SO ORDERED that the stipulation is granted as follows: 7 Defendant shall have an extension of time, up to and including October 27, 2017, to file a 8 responsive pleading to Plaintiff’s initial complaint. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 28, 2017 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT AND ORDER CASE NO: 2:17-CV-00272-MCE-CKD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?