Sanchez-Saragoza v. Peery

Filing 11

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/21/2017 DISMISSING this action without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 MIGUEL CARRANZA SANCHEZSARAGOZA, Petitioner, 13 14 15 No. 2:17-cv-0278 KJN P ORDER v. SUZANNE M. PEERY, Respondent. 16 17 18 Petitioner consented to proceed before the undersigned for all purposes. See 28 U.S.C. 19 § 636(c). By order filed March 14, 2017, petitioner was ordered to show cause, within twenty- 20 one days, why this action should not be dismissed based on petitioner’s failure to exhaust his state 21 court remedies. (ECF No. 9.) The twenty-one day period has now expired, and petitioner has not 22 shown cause or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 23 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local 24 Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 25 Dated: April 21, 2017 26 27 28 /cw/sara0278.fsc 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?