Sanchez-Saragoza v. Peery

Filing 11

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/21/2017 DISMISSING this action without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

MIGUEL CARRANZA SANCHEZSARAGOZA,
Petitioner,

13
14
15

No. 2:17-cv-0278 KJN P

ORDER
v.
SUZANNE M. PEERY,
Respondent.

16
17
18

Petitioner consented to proceed before the undersigned for all purposes. See 28 U.S.C.

19

§ 636(c). By order filed March 14, 2017, petitioner was ordered to show cause, within twenty-

20

one days, why this action should not be dismissed based on petitioner’s failure to exhaust his state

21

court remedies. (ECF No. 9.) The twenty-one day period has now expired, and petitioner has not

22

shown cause or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

23

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local

24

Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

25

Dated: April 21, 2017

26
27
28

/cw/sara0278.fsc

1