Galindo v. Salazar

Filing 13

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/26/2017 GRANTING 12 Motion for Redaction. (Henshaw, R)

Download PDF
1 PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney 2 Megan A. S. Richards Assistant United States Attorney 3 2500 Tulare Street, Suite 4401 Fresno, CA 93721 4 Telephone: (559) 497-4000 Facsimile: (559) 497-4099 5 Attorneys for Respondent 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SILVER GALINDO, 2:17-CV-00302-EFB (HC) 10 Petitioner, 11 vs. 12 REQUEST FOR REDACTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER JOSIAS SALAZAR, 13 Respondent. 14 REQUEST FOR REDACTION 15 16 The United States of America, by and through its attorney of record in this case, Assistant United 17 States Attorney, Megan A. S. Richards, requests that the Court replace the exhibit at 2:17-cv-0030218 EFB, Doc. 11, Exhibit 1, with the redacted exhibit attached to this Motion. The undersigned 19 inadvertently filed the document without redacting personal identifying information as required by Fed. 20 R. Civ. P. 5.2 and Fed. R. Crim. P. 49.1. The document attached to this Request for Redaction is the 21 same as the previously filed document, but has been redacted to comply with privacy rules. 22 Accordingly, the United States asks that the Court order the attached document be substituted for the 23 document currently filed as 2:17-CV-00302-EFB, Doc. 11, and Exhibit 1. 24 Dated: June 20, 2017 PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney 25 By: /s/ Megan A. S. Richards Megan A. S. Richards Assistant United States Attorney 26 27 28 REQUEST FOR REDACTION [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 IT IS SO ORDERED this 26th day of June, 2017. 3 4 5 THE HONORABLE EDMUND F. BRENNAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER TO REDACT EXHIBIT 1 EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT B EXHIBIT C EXHIBIT D EXHIBIT E

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?