Johnson v. Parvez et al

Filing 11

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 6/15/2017 STAYING this action and REFERRING this matter to the court's Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program; ORDERING the parties to contact the court's VDRP Administrator within fourteen (14 ) days; DIRECTING the parties to carefully review and comply with Local Rule 271 regarding specifications and requirements of the VDRP; ORDERING the parties to jointly file a VDRP Completion Report within fourteen (14) days after completion of the VDRP session; ORDERING that any objections be filed within seven (7) days. (cc: VDRP) (Michel, G.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

SCOTT JOHNSON,

12
13
14

No. 2:17-cv-00311-TLN-DB

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

MOHAMMED A PARVEZ, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff commenced this disability access case asserting a claim under the Americans

18

with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and related state law claims, and defendant has answered the

19

complaint.

20

In the interest of avoiding the accumulation of fees and costs through potentially

21

unnecessary discovery and motion practice, and to allow the parties some time to pursue an early

22

informal resolution of this matter, the court finds it appropriate to temporarily stay and refer the

23

action to the court’s Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program (“VDRP”).

24

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

25

1. This action is STAYED and REFERRED to the VDRP.

26

2. Within fourteen (14) days of this order, the parties shall contact the court’s VDRP

27

administrator, Sujean Park, at [phone] or [e-mail], to start

28

the process of selecting an appropriate neutral.
1

1
2
3

3. The parties shall carefully review and comply with Local Rule 271, which outlines the
specifications and requirements of the VDRP.
4. No later than fourteen (14) days after completion of the VDRP session, the parties

4

shall jointly file their VDRP Completion Report, consistent with Local Rule 271(o).

5

5. Any party that objects to this referral to the VDRP shall file its objections within seven

6

(7) days of this order. Such objections shall clearly outline why that party believes

7

that the action is not appropriate for referral to the VDRP.

8

IT IS SO ORDERED.

9
10

DATED: June 15, 2017

11

Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2