Johnson v. Parvez et al
Filing
11
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 6/15/2017 STAYING this action and REFERRING this matter to the court's Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program; ORDERING the parties to contact the court's VDRP Administrator within fourteen (14 ) days; DIRECTING the parties to carefully review and comply with Local Rule 271 regarding specifications and requirements of the VDRP; ORDERING the parties to jointly file a VDRP Completion Report within fourteen (14) days after completion of the VDRP session; ORDERING that any objections be filed within seven (7) days. (cc: VDRP) (Michel, G.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
SCOTT JOHNSON,
12
13
14
No. 2:17-cv-00311-TLN-DB
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
MOHAMMED A PARVEZ, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff commenced this disability access case asserting a claim under the Americans
18
with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and related state law claims, and defendant has answered the
19
complaint.
20
In the interest of avoiding the accumulation of fees and costs through potentially
21
unnecessary discovery and motion practice, and to allow the parties some time to pursue an early
22
informal resolution of this matter, the court finds it appropriate to temporarily stay and refer the
23
action to the court’s Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program (“VDRP”).
24
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
25
1. This action is STAYED and REFERRED to the VDRP.
26
2. Within fourteen (14) days of this order, the parties shall contact the court’s VDRP
27
administrator, Sujean Park, at (916) 930-4278 or SPark@caed.uscourts.gov, to start
28
the process of selecting an appropriate neutral.
1
1
2
3
3. The parties shall carefully review and comply with Local Rule 271, which outlines the
specifications and requirements of the VDRP.
4. No later than fourteen (14) days after completion of the VDRP session, the parties
4
shall jointly file their VDRP Completion Report, consistent with Local Rule 271(o).
5
5. Any party that objects to this referral to the VDRP shall file its objections within seven
6
(7) days of this order. Such objections shall clearly outline why that party believes
7
that the action is not appropriate for referral to the VDRP.
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
10
DATED: June 15, 2017
11
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?