Garces v. Pickett et al

Filing 88

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/29/2019 GRANTING 87 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff to have up to 9/13/2019 to file a response to 66 Motion for Judgement on the Pleadings. (Henshaw, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LUIS MANUEL GARCES, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 v. No. 2:17-cv-0319 JAM AC P ORDER J. PICKETT, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff has filed another request for an extension of time to file a response to defendants’ 18 motion for judgment on the pleadings. ECF No. 87. The current deadline for a response is 19 August 14, 2019. ECF No. 86. 20 Plaintiff asserts that less than a week after defendants filed their motion he was transferred 21 for a court appearance and separated from his legal property until June 4, 2019. Id. Then, eight 22 days after he gained access to his property, he was placed into administrative segregation and 23 once again separated from his property. Id. His legal property was finally returned on July 14, 24 2019, but now he has access to the law library only one day per week. Id. As a result, he seeks 25 an additional thirty days to file a response to defendants’ motion. Id. Good cause appearing, the 26 request will be granted. 27 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 28 1. Plaintiff’s request for an extension of time (ECF No. 87) is granted; and 1 2. Plaintiff shall have an additional thirty days, up to September 13, 2019, to file a 2 response to defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings. 3 DATED: July 29, 2019 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?