Lear v. Avila, et al.

Filing 64

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 9/9/2020 ADOPTING 62 Findings and Recommendations in full and SUBSTITUTING CDCR in place of HDSP as defendant in this action. (York, M)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 RODERICK WILLIAM LEAR, 6 No. 2:17-cv-0326-JAM-EFB P Plaintiff, 7 v. 8 D. AVILA, et al., 9 ORDER Defendants. 10 11 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 12 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 13 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 14 On July 23, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 15 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 16 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed 17 objections to the findings and recommendations. 18 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 19 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 20 ORDERED that: 21 1. The findings and recommendations filed July 23, 2020, are adopted in full; and 22 2. CDCR is substituted in place of HDSP as defendant in this action. 23 24 25 26 DATED: September 9, 2020 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ _____ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?