Bruno v. Equifax Credit Information Services, LLC, et al.
Filing
282
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/10/2019 GRANTING #271 Request to Seal, DENYING #277 Motion to Strike and DENYING #254 Motion for Sanctions. (Donati, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
DANIEL BRUNO,
11
12
13
14
No. 2:17-cv-327-WBS-EFB
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER AFTER HEARING
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES,
LLC, et al.,
Defendants.
15
16
17
This case was before the court on January 9, 2019, for hearing on (1) plaintiff’s motion for
18
sanctions against defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC (“Equifax”) (ECF No. 254), (2)
19
Equifax’s request to seal documents (ECF No. 271), and (3) plaintiff’s motion to strike Equifax’s
20
opposition to plaintiff’s motion for sanctions (ECF No. 277). Attorney Joseph Messer appeared
21
on behalf of plaintiff. Attorneys Zachary McEntyre and Edward Bedard appeared on behalf of
22
defendant Equifax.
23
For the reasons stated on the record, it is ORDERED that:
24
1. Equifax’s request to seal (ECF No. 271) is granted, and the following documents shall
25
be filed under seal:
26
a. Exhibits A and E-M to Plaintiff’s Motion for Sanctions (ECF No. 254);
27
b. Exhibits A, K, and R-X to the declaration of Zachary A. McEntyre in support
28
of Equifax’s opposition to plaintiff’s motion for sanctions (ECF No. 270-1);
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
c. The unredacted version of Equifax’s opposition to plaintiff’s motion for
sanctions; and
d. The declaration of Jason Esteves submitted in support of Equifax’s opposition
to plaintiff’s motion for sanctions.
2. Plaintiff’s motion to strike Equifax’s opposition to plaintiff’s motion for sanctions
(ECF No. 277) is denied.
3. Plaintiff’s motion for sanctions against defendant Equifax (ECF No. 254) is denied.
DATED: January 10, 2019.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?