Bruno v. Equifax Credit Information Services, LLC, et al.

Filing 31

STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 4/11/2017 ORDERING Defendant B.B. Direct, Inc. to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the 1 Complaint by 4/26/2017. (Michel, G.)

Download PDF
1 MICHAEL J. STEINER (State Bar No. 112079) mjs@severson.com 2 JOEL L. HALVERSON (State Bar No. 174649) jlh@severson.com 3 ALISA A. GIVENTAL (State Bar No. 273551) aag@severson.com 4 SEVERSON & WERSON A Professional Corporation 5 One Embarcadero Center, Suite 2600 San Francisco, California 94111 6 Telephone: (415) 398-3344 Facsimile: (415) 956-0439 7 Attorneys for Defendant 8 B.B. DIRECT, INC. 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 DANIEL BRUNO, Individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, 14 Plaintiffs, 15 vs. 16 EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, 17 LLC; GENEVA FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC; RMB WORLD ENTERPRISES, LLC 18 d/b/a DECISION LINKS; B.B. DIRECT, INC.; GENESIS MARKETING GROUP, 19 INC. d/b/a HITMAN DIRECT; AMERICAN MARKETING AND MAILING SERVICES, 20 INC.; STRATEGIC MARKING SERVICES, LLC. 21 Defendants. 22 23 Case No. 2:17-cv-00327-WBS-EFB SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND RESPONSE DEADLINE FOR B.B. DIRECT, INC. TO RESPOND TO CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT Complaint Filed: February 15, 2017 Current Response Date: April 12, 2017 New Response Date: April 26, 2017 Plaintiff Daniel Bruno (“Plaintiff”) and defendant B.B. Direct, Inc. (“BB Direct”) hereby 24 stipulate as follows: 25 WHEREAS, on February 15, 2017, Plaintiff filed the instant action; 26 WHEREAS, on March 31, 2017, Plaintiff and co-defendants Equifax Information 27 Services, LLC and Geneva Financial Services, LLC entered into a stipulation extending their 28 deadline to respond to the Complaint by 28 days, until April 12, 2017; 00000.9298/10631505.1 1 1:17-CV-00322-LJO-EPG SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND RESPONSE DEADLINE FOR B.B. DIRECT, INC. TO RESPOND TO CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT 1 WHEREAS, the aforementioned stipulation included BB Direct, although it had not 2 retained counsel, appeared in the action, or signed the stipulation; 3 WHEREAS, BB Direct retained counsel on April 6, 2017 and sought an additional 14-day 4 extension on its response deadline to the Complaint; 5 WHEREAS, Plaintiff, through counsel, has agreed to a further 14-day extension for BB 6 Direct to respond to the Complaint; 7 WHEREFORE, Plaintiff and BB Direct stipulate as follows: 8 1. The time for BB Direct to respond to the complaint shall be extended by 14 9 additional days up to and including April 26, 2017. 10 2. This stipulation is without prejudice to the rights, claims, arguments and defenses 11 of all parties. 12 DATED: April 10, 2017 13 SEVERSON & WERSON A Professional Corporation 14 By: 15 /s/ Alisa A. Givental Alisa A. Givental 16 Attorneys for Defendant B.B. DIRECT, INC. 17 18 DATED: April 10, 2017 LAW OFFICES OF JAMES LOUIS KOHL 19 20 By: 21 22 /s/ James Louis Kohl James Louis Kohl Attorneys for Plaintiff DANIEL BRUNO 23 24 I, Alisa A. Givental, attest that James Louis Kohl, on whose behalf the filing is submitted, concurs in the filing’s content and has authorized the filing. /s/ Alisa A, Givental 25 26 27 28 2:17-CV-00327-WBS-EFB 2 SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND RESPONSE DEADLINE FOR B.B. DIRECT, INC. TO RESPOND TO CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT 00000.9298/10631505.1 1 2 ORDER Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED that the deadline for defendant 3 B.B. Direct, Inc. to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the complaint is extended by 14 4 additional days, until April 26, 2017. 5 Dated: April 11, 2017 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2:17-CV-00327-WBS-EFB 3 SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND RESPONSE DEADLINE FOR B.B. DIRECT, INC. TO RESPOND TO CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT 00000.9298/10631505.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?