Bruno v. Equifax Credit Information Services, LLC, et al.
Filing
37
[DISREGARD FILED IN ERROR. SEE ECF NO. 38] STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 4/27/17: The deadline for defendant B.B. Direct, Inc. to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the complaint is extended by 14 additional days, until April 26, 2017. (Kaminski, H) Modified on 4/27/2017 (Shaddox-Waldrop, A).
1 MICHAEL J. STEINER (State Bar No. 112079)
mjs@severson.com
2 JOEL L. HALVERSON (State Bar No. 174649)
jlh@severson.com
3 ALISA A. GIVENTAL (State Bar No. 273551)
aag@severson.com
4 SEVERSON & WERSON
A Professional Corporation
5 One Embarcadero Center, Suite 2600
San Francisco, California 94111
6 Telephone: (415) 398-3344
Facsimile: (415) 956-0439
7
Attorneys for Defendant
8 B.B. DIRECT, INC.
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13 DANIEL BRUNO, Individually and on behalf
of others similarly situated,
14
Plaintiffs,
15
vs.
16
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES,
17 LLC; GENEVA FINANCIAL SERVICES,
LLC; RMB WORLD ENTERPRISES, LLC
18 d/b/a DECISION LINKS; B.B. DIRECT,
INC.; GENESIS MARKETING GROUP,
19 INC. d/b/a HITMAN DIRECT; AMERICAN
MARKETING AND MAILING SERVICES,
20 INC.; STRATEGIC MARKING SERVICES,
LLC.
21
Defendants.
22
23
Case No. 2:17-cv-00327-WBS-EFB
SECOND STIPULATION AND ORDER
TO EXTEND RESPONSE DEADLINE
FOR B.B. DIRECT, INC. TO RESPOND
TO CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
Complaint Filed: February 15, 2017
Current Response Date: April 12, 2017
New Response Date: April 26, 2017
Plaintiff Daniel Bruno (“Plaintiff”) and defendant B.B. Direct, Inc. (“BB Direct”) hereby
24 stipulate as follows:
25
WHEREAS, on February 15, 2017, Plaintiff filed the instant action;
26
WHEREAS, on March 31, 2017, Plaintiff and co-defendants Equifax Information
27 Services, LLC and Geneva Financial Services, LLC entered into a stipulation extending their
28 deadline to respond to the Complaint by 28 days, until April 12, 2017;
12047.0024/10688348.1
1
1:17-CV-00322-LJO-EPG
SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND RESPONSE DEADLINE FOR B.B. DIRECT,
INC. TO RESPOND TO CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
1
WHEREAS, the aforementioned stipulation included BB Direct, although it had not
2 retained counsel, appeared in the action, or signed the stipulation;
3
WHEREAS, BB Direct retained counsel on April 6, 2017 and sought an additional 14-day
4 extension on its response deadline to the Complaint;
5
WHEREAS, Plaintiff, through counsel, has agreed to a further 14-day extension for BB
6 Direct to respond to the Complaint;
7
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff and BB Direct stipulate as follows:
8
1.
The time for BB Direct to respond to the complaint shall be extended by 14
9 additional days up to and including April 26, 2017.
10
2.
This stipulation is without prejudice to the rights, claims, arguments and defenses
11 of all parties.
12 DATED: April 10, 2017
13
SEVERSON & WERSON
A Professional Corporation
14
By:
15
/s/ Alisa A. Givental
Alisa A. Givental
16
Attorneys for Defendant B.B. DIRECT, INC.
17
18 DATED: April 10, 2017
LAW OFFICES OF JAMES LOUIS KOHL
19
20
By:
21
22
/s/ James Louis Kohl
James Louis Kohl
Attorneys for Plaintiff DANIEL BRUNO
23
24 I, Alisa A. Givental, attest that James Louis Kohl, on whose behalf the filing is submitted, concurs
in the filing’s content and has authorized the filing. /s/ Alisa A, Givental
25
26
27
28
2:17-CV-00327-WBS-EFB
2
SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND RESPONSE DEADLINE FOR B.B. DIRECT,
INC. TO RESPOND TO CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
12047.0024/10688348.1
1
2
ORDER
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED that the deadline for defendant
3 B.B. Direct, Inc. to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the complaint is extended by 14
4 additional days, until April 26, 2017.
5 Dated: April 27, 2017
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2:17-CV-00327-WBS-EFB
3
SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND RESPONSE DEADLINE FOR B.B. DIRECT,
INC. TO RESPOND TO CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
12047.0024/10688348.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?