A. et al v. Oroville Hospital et al

Filing 16

ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 2/6/18, ORDERING that the deadlines in the Court's scheduling order in this matter are hereby STAYED until further notice. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 DA, BA, JA, minors acting by and through Guardian ad Litem, Plaintiffs, vs. OROVILLE HOSPITAL, BI-COUNTY AMBULANCE, and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive, DEFENDANTS. Case No.: 2:17-cv-00337-MCE-CMK ORDER ON STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING ORDER DEADLINES DUE TO POTENTIAL RELATED CASE 16 17 18 The Court, having reviewed and considered the parties’ stipulated request in this matter 19 to vacate or stay the existing scheduling order in light of the filing of a potentially related matter, 20 and finding good cause, GRANTS the stipulated request. 21 22 23 The deadlines in the Court’s scheduling order in this matter are hereby stayed until further notice. Having represented that this case should be related to another pending action entitled 24 Estate of Leslie of Leslie Cramblit, et al., v. Jonnyrae Mountain Witt, et al., Case No. 2:17-cv- 25 02478-KJM-DB, Plaintiff is directed to file forthwith a Notice of Related Cases pursuant to 26 Eastern District Local Rule 123. Provided the cases are related, Plaintiff shall file any 27 subsequent motion to coordinate and/or consolidate the two proceedings not later than February 28 15, 2018. 1 ORDER ON STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING ORDER DEADLINES DUE TO POTENTIAL RELATED CASE 1 2 3 4 The Court will schedule a status conference as needed following adjudication of the anticipated motion to consolidate. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 6, 2018 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 ORDER ON STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING ORDER DEADLINES DUE TO POTENTIAL RELATED CASE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?