Alem v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al

Filing 20

ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 2/27/2019 ADOPTING 14 findings and recommendations in full. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is DISMISSED as a defendant to this action. This case is REFERRED back to the assigned magistrate judge for all further pretrial proceedings. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANIEL ALEM, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 No. 2:17-CV-0343-KJM-DMC-P v. ORDER CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42 19 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 20 Eastern District of California local rules. On November 20, 2018, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations, 21 22 which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections 23 within the time specified therein. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been 24 filed. 25 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United 26 States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 27 reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations 28 of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] 1 1 court . . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be 2 supported by the record and by the proper analysis. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The findings and recommendations filed November 20, 2018, are adopted 6 2. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is dismissed 7 as a defendant to this action; and 8 3. 5 9 10 in full; This case is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for all further pretrial proceedings. DATED: February 27, 2019. 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?