Alem v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
Filing
40
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 0102/20 GRANTING 33 , 36 Motions for Extension of time. Defendants' motion for summary judgment filed on 11/08/19 is deemed timely. Plaintiff's opposition filed on 12/05/19 is deemed timely. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DANIEL ALEM,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:17-CV-0343-KJM-DMC-P
v.
ORDER
M. CURRY, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to
17
18
42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court are: (1) defendants’ motion for an extension of time
19
to file a dispositive motion (ECF No. 33); and (2)) plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to
20
file an opposition to defendants’ motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 36). Neither motion is
21
opposed.
Good cause appearing therefore, the parties’ motions will be granted. Defendants’
22
23
motion for summary judgment, filed on November 8, 2019, will be deemed timely. Plaintiff’s
24
opposition thereto, filed on December 5, 2019, will also be deemed timely. Defendants have filed
25
a reply and the fully briefed motion for summary judgment stands submitted and will be
26
addressed by separate findings and recommendations.
27
///
28
///
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
Defendant’s motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 33) is granted;
3
2.
Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, filed on November 8, 2019, is
4
deemed timely;
5
3.
Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 36) is granted; and
6
4.
Plaintiff’s opposition, filed on December 5, 2019, is deemed timely.
7
8
Dated: January 2, 2020
____________________________________
DENNIS M. COTA
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?