Etuate Sekona v. Lizarraga et al

Filing 30

ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/28/2018 ADOPTING the 25 findings and recommendations in full. Plaintiff's claims against defendants Lizarraga, Chambers, and Mesa are DISMISSED without prejudice. This case is REFERRED back to the assigned magistrate judge for all further pretrial proceedings. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ETUATE SEKONA, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:17-cv-0346-KJM-EFB P v. ORDER JOE LIZARRAGA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 17 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided 19 by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 16, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which 20 21 were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings 22 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the 23 findings and recommendations. 24 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 25 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the file, the court 26 finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed August 16, 2018, are adopted in full; 3 2. Plaintiff’s claims against defendants Lizarraga, Chambers, and Mesa are dismissed 4 5 without prejudice; and 3. This case is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for all further pretrial 6 proceedings. 7 DATED: September 28, 2018. 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?