Etuate Sekona v. Lizarraga et al
Filing
30
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/28/2018 ADOPTING the 25 findings and recommendations in full. Plaintiff's claims against defendants Lizarraga, Chambers, and Mesa are DISMISSED without prejudice. This case is REFERRED back to the assigned magistrate judge for all further pretrial proceedings. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ETUATE SEKONA,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:17-cv-0346-KJM-EFB P
v.
ORDER
JOE LIZARRAGA, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
17
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided
19
by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On August 16, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which
20
21
were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings
22
and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the
23
findings and recommendations.
24
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
25
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the file, the court
26
finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
27
/////
28
/////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed August 16, 2018, are adopted in full;
3
2. Plaintiff’s claims against defendants Lizarraga, Chambers, and Mesa are dismissed
4
5
without prejudice; and
3. This case is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for all further pretrial
6
proceedings.
7
DATED: September 28, 2018.
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?