Etuate Sekona v. Lizarraga et al

Filing 39

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/6/18 ORDERING Settlement Conference before Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney set for 1/31/2019 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 24 (CKD). Parties are directed to submit confidential settlement statements no later than 1/24/19. (cc Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney) (Coll, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12

ETUATE SEKONA,

13
14
15
16

No. 2:17-cv-0346-KJM-EFB P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE

JOE A. LIZARRAGA, et al.,
Defendants.

17
18

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42

19

U.S.C. §1983. On October 26, 2018, the parties were ordered to inform this court’s ADR

20

division if they believed a settlement conference would be beneficial. ECF No. 36. After a

21

review of the parties’ responses, the court has determined that this case will benefit from a

22

settlement conference. Therefore, this case will be referred to Magistrate Judge Carolyn K.

23

Delaney to conduct a settlement conference at the U. S. District Court, 501 I Street, Sacramento,

24

California 95814 in Courtroom #24 on January 31, 2019 at 9:30 a.m.

25

Plaintiff shall have the option to appear at the settlement conference in person or by video

26

conference. In the event video conferencing capabilities are unavailable, plaintiff may appear by

27

telephone. Plaintiff will be required to return the attached form advising the court how he would

28

like to appear at the settlement conference so that the court may issue the appropriate orders. A
1

1
2

separate order and writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum will issue once it has been determined

3

how plaintiff will appear.

4

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

5

1. This case is set for a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Carolyn K.

6

Delaney on January 31, 2019 at 9:30 a.m. at the U. S. District Court, 501 I Street,

7

Sacramento, California 95814 in Courtroom #24.

8

2. Parties are instructed to have a principal with full settlement authority present at the

9

Settlement Conference or to be fully authorized to settle the matter on any terms. The

10

individual with full authority to settle must also have “unfettered discretion and

11

authority” to change the settlement position of the party, if appropriate. The purpose

12

behind requiring the attendance of a person with full settlement authority is that the

13

parties’ view of the case may be altered during the face to face conference. An

14

authorization to settle for a limited dollar amount or sum certain can be found not to

15

comply with the requirement of full authority to settle1.

16

3. Plaintiff shall have the choice to attend the settlement conference in person or by

17

video. Within ten days after the filing date of this order, plaintiff shall return the

18

attached form notifying the court whether he would like to attend the settlement

19

conference in person or by video. If plaintiff chooses to appear by video and video

20

conferencing is not available, he may appear by telephone. If plaintiff does not return

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

While the exercise of its authority is subject to abuse of discretion review, “the district court has the
authority to order parties, including the federal government, to participate in mandatory settlement
conferences… .” United States v. United States District Court for the Northern Mariana Islands, 694 F.3d 1051,
1053, 1057, 1059 (9th Cir. 2012)(“the district court has broad authority to compel participation in mandatory
settlement conference[s].”). The term “full authority to settle” means that the individuals attending the
mediation conference must be authorized to fully explore settlement options and to agree at that time to any
settlement terms acceptable to the parties. G. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc. v. Joseph Oat Corp., 871 F.2d 648,
653 (7th Cir. 1989), cited with approval in Official Airline Guides, Inc. v. Goss, 6 F.3d 1385, 1396 (9th Cir. 1993).
The individual with full authority to settle must also have “unfettered discretion and authority” to change the
settlement position of the party, if appropriate. Pitman v. Brinker Int’l., Inc., 216 F.R.D. 481, 485‐86 (D. Ariz.
2003), amended on recon. in part, Pitman v. Brinker Int’l., Inc., 2003 WL 23353478 (D. Ariz. 2003). The
purpose behind requiring the attendance of a person with full settlement authority is that the parties’ view of
the case may be altered during the face to face conference. Pitman, 216 F.R.D. at 486. An authorization to
settle for a limited dollar amount or sum certain can be found not to comply with the requirement of full
authority to settle. Nick v. Morgan’s Foods, Inc., 270 F.3d 590, 596‐97 (8th Cir. 2001).
1

2

1
2

the form telling the court how he would like to attend the conference, the court will

3

issue orders for plaintiff to appear by video.

4

4. Parties are directed to submit confidential settlement statements no later than January

5

24, 2019 to [e-mail]. Plaintiff shall mail his confidential

6

settlement statement Attn: Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney, USDC CAED, 501 I

7

Street, Suite 4-200, Sacramento, California 95814 so it arrives no later than January

8

24, 2019. The envelope shall be marked “CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT

9

STATEMENT.” Parties are also directed to file a “Notice of Submission of

10

Confidential Settlement Statement” (See L.R. 270(d)).

11
12

Settlement statements should not be filed with the Clerk of the Court nor served on

13

any other party. Settlement statements shall be clearly marked “confidential” with

14

the date and time of the settlement conference indicated prominently thereon.

15
16

The confidential settlement statement shall be no longer than five pages in length,

17

typed or neatly printed, and include the following:

18
19

a. A brief statement of the facts of the case.

20

b. A brief statement of the claims and defenses, i.e., statutory or other grounds upon

21

which the claims are founded; a forthright evaluation of the parties’ likelihood of

22

prevailing on the claims and defenses; and a description of the major issues in

23

dispute.

24

c. A summary of the proceedings to date.

25

d. An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further discovery, pretrial, and

26
27

trial.
e. The relief sought.

28
3

1
2
3
4
5
6

f. The party’s position on settlement, including present demands and offers and a
history of past settlement discussions, offers, and demands.
g. A brief statement of each party’s expectations and goals for the settlement
conference, including how much a party is willing to accept and/or willing to pay.
h. If the parties intend to discuss the joint settlement of any other actions or claims

7

not in this suit, give a brief description of each action or claim as set forth above,

8

including case number(s) if applicable.

9

DATED: December 6, 2018.

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ETUATE SEKONA,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:17-cv-00346-KJM-EFB P

v.
JOE A. LIZARRAGA, et al.,

15

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE ON TYPE OF
APPEARANCE AT SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE

Defendants.

16
Check one:

17
18

Plaintiff would like to participate in the settlement conference in person.

19
20
21

Plaintiff would like to participate in the settlement conference by video/telephone.

22
23
24
25
26

Date

Etuate Sekona
Plaintiff pro se

27
28
5