Etuate Sekona v. Lizarraga et al

Filing 57

ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/21/19 ADOPTING the findings and recommendations filed 2/8/19, in full; DENYING Plaintiff's motions for a temporary restraining order (ECF Nos. 41 & 42 ) without prejudice; and REFERRING this matter back to the assigned magistrate judge for all further pretrial proceedings. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ETUATE SEKONA, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:17-cv-0346-KJM-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER JOE A. LIZARRAGA, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided 19 by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On February 8, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which 21 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 25 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the 26 findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 27 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 28 1. The findings and recommendations filed February 8, 2019, are adopted in full; 1 1 2 3 2. Plaintiff’s motions for a temporary restraining order (ECF Nos. 41 & 42) are denied without prejudice; and 3. This matter is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for all further pretrial 4 proceedings. 5 DATED: March 21, 2019. 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?