Etuate Sekona v. Lizarraga et al

Filing 71

ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/23/19 ADOPTING 58 Findings and Recommendations in full and DENYING 52 Motion for TRO. (Coll, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ETUATE SEKONA, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:17-cv-0346-KJM-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER JOE LIZARRAGA, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided 19 by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On March 28, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were 21 served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings 22 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the 23 findings and recommendations. 24 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 25 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the 26 findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. Consistent 27 with the magistrate judge’s observation at page 2, lines 10-11 of the findings and 28 recommendations, ECF No. 58, while plaintiff may not raise in this action claims based on events 1 1 that occurred at Kern Valley State Prison described in his objections, he may be able to initiate a 2 new action based on those alleged events. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 28, 2019, are adopted in full; and 5 2. Plaintiff’s motion for temporary restraining order (ECF No. 52) is denied. 6 DATED: July 23, 2019. 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?