Etuate Sekona v. Lizarraga et al
Filing
71
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/23/19 ADOPTING 58 Findings and Recommendations in full and DENYING 52 Motion for TRO. (Coll, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ETUATE SEKONA,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:17-cv-0346-KJM-EFB P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
JOE LIZARRAGA, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided
19
by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On March 28, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were
21
served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings
22
and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the
23
findings and recommendations.
24
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
25
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the
26
findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. Consistent
27
with the magistrate judge’s observation at page 2, lines 10-11 of the findings and
28
recommendations, ECF No. 58, while plaintiff may not raise in this action claims based on events
1
1
that occurred at Kern Valley State Prison described in his objections, he may be able to initiate a
2
new action based on those alleged events.
3
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
4
1. The findings and recommendations filed March 28, 2019, are adopted in full; and
5
2. Plaintiff’s motion for temporary restraining order (ECF No. 52) is denied.
6
DATED: July 23, 2019.
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?