Mostajo et al v. Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co.
Filing
22
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 2/13/2018 GRANTING leave to file Second Amended Complaint. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
ROBIN G. WORKMAN, Bar No. 145810
WORKMAN LAW FIRM, P.C.
177 Post Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, CA 94108
Telephone:
415.782.3660
Facsimile:
415.788.1028
4
5
Attorney for Plaintiffs
ANTHONY MARC MOSTAJO and
ELAINE QUEDENS
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
JAMES J. OH, IL Bar No. 6196413 (admitted pro hac vice)
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
321 North Clark Street, Suite 1000
Chicago, IL 60654
Telephone:
312.372.5520
Facsimile:
312.372.7880
KAI-CHING CHA, Bar No. 218738
MICHAEL J. HUI, Bar No. 273212
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
333 Bush Street, 34th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone:
415.433.1940
Facsimile:
415.399.8490
Attorneys for Defendant
NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
18
ANTHONY MARC MOSTAJO, and ELAINE
QUEDENS, on behalf of himself and all others
similarly situated,
19
Plaintiffs,
Case No. 2:17-CV-00350-JAM-AC
STIPULATION AND ORDER
GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
20
v.
21
22
23
NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE
COMPANY, and Does 1 through 50, inclusive,
Defendants.
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 2:17-CV-00350-JAM-AC
STIPULATION RE 2ND AMD COMPLAINT
1
Plaintiffs Anthony Marc Mostajo (“Mostajo”) and Elaine Quedens (“Quedens”), on behalf of
2
themselves and all others similarly situated, and Defendant Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
3
(“Nationwide”) (collectively, the “Parties”), through their respective counsel of record and with
4
reference to the following facts, stipulate and agree as follows:
5
6
7
8
WHEREAS, on or about January 9, 2017, Mostajo filed the original Complaint in this action
alleging violations of the California Labor Code against Nationwide;
WHEREAS, on or about February 14, 2017, Mostajo and Quedens filed their First Amended
Complaint alleging violations of the California Labor Code against Nationwide;
9
WHEREAS, since the filing of the First Amended Complaint, the Parties have engaged in
10
significant discovery, exchanging documents and data regarding the parties’ claims and defenses;
11
WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed that Mostajo and Quedens may file a Second Amended
12
Complaint, attached hereto as Exhibit A, for the purpose of adding additional causes of action
13
against Nationwide;
14
15
WHEREAS, the Parties agree that Nationwide shall have thirty (30) days from the date of
filing of the Second Amended Complaint to respond to the Second Amended Complaint;
16
NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate and agree that Mostajo and Quedens may
17
file the [Proposed] Second Amended Complaint against Nationwide which is attached as Exhibit A
18
to this Stipulation. The [Proposed] Second Amended Complaint will be deemed filed and served as
19
of the date the Court signs the Order granting this Stipulation.
20
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 2:17-CV-00350-JAM-AC
2.
STIPULATION RE 2ND AMD COMPLAINT
1
Date: February 12, 2018
/s/Robin G. Workman
ROBIN G. WORKMAN
WORKMAN LAW FIRM, P.C.
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
ANTHONY MARC MOSTAJO and ELAINE
QUEDENS
2
3
4
5
Date: February 12, 2018
6
7
8
/s/Kai-Ching Cha
JAMES J. OH
KAI-CHING CHA
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
Attorneys for Defendant
NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE
COMPANY
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
Dated: 2/13/2018
/s/ John A. Mendez_______________________
12
HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 2:17-CV-00350-JAM-AC
3.
STIPULATION RE 2ND AMD COMPLAINT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?