Galasyn et al v. Sleight et al

Filing 12

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 7/31/2017 ORDERING that the time for defendants Shaw, Sleight and Galasyn, Inc. to respond to the Complaint is EXTENDED to 9/29/2017. (Washington, S)

1
2
3
4

Nicholas R. Kloeppel, SBN #186165
MITCHELL, BRISSO, DELANEY & VRIEZE, LLP
Attorneys at Law
814 Seventh Street
P. O. Drawer 1008
Eureka, CA 95502
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

5
6

Attorneys for Defendants
DOUGLAS SHAW, VICKY SLEIGHT,
GALASYN, INC.

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

William W. Palmer, SBN #146404
PALMER LAW GROUP, PLC
2443 Fair Oaks Blvd., No. 545
Sacramento, CA 95825
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
EDWARD GALASYN, MARTA A.
KINGSBURY in her capacity as
Administrator of the Estate of
Edward Galasyn

15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

17
18
19

EDWARD GALASYN, MARTA A.
KINGSBURY in her capacity as
Administrator of the Estate of
Edward Galasyn,

20

CASE NO.: 17-CV-00363-TLN-EFB
STIPULATION TO EXTEND
DEFENDANTS’ TIME FOR FILING
RESPONSIVE PLEADING

Plaintiff,

21

vs.

22

VICKY SLEIGHT, DOUGLAS SHAW,
GALASYN, INC.,

23
24

Defendants.

25
26
MITCHELL, BRISSO,
DELANEY & VRIEZE
814 Seventh Street
P.O. Drawer 1008
Eureka, CA 95502

__________________________________________1_____________________________________________

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS’ TIME FOR FILING RESPONSIVE
PLEADING

1

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, plaintiffs

2

EDWARD GALASYN, MARTA A. KINGSBURY in her capacity as Administrator of

3

the Estate of Edward Galasyn (“Plaintiffs”), and defendants DOUGLAS SHAW,

4

VICKY SLEIGHT and GALASYN, INC. (“Defendants”), through their respective

5

attorneys as follows:

6

1.

Plaintiffs filed an initial Complaint on February 21, 2017.

7

2.

Defendants, who were served with the initial Complaint, are required to

8

respond to the Complaint on or before July 31, 2017, pursuant to this court’s order filed

9

on June 30, 2017, (ECF Docket No. 9).

10

3.

The parties have continued meaningful efforts to resolve the disputed

11

issues. They are currently awaiting the approval of a Stipulated Protective Order

12

submitted on July 24, 2017 (ECF Docket No. 10). Upon receiving the Order, the

13

defendants will be releasing records to plaintiffs that are anticipated to move this case

14

towards a resolution.

15

4.

Counsel for plaintiffs will have limited availability during the month of

16

August from August 1 through August 14, 2017, as he will be out of the country.

17

Counsel for defendants has limited availability as a result of a federal trial in the

18

Northern District from August 18 through August 30, 2017.

19

5.

Defendants previously requested, and Plaintiffs agreed on three occasions,

20

to extend Defendants’ time to file a responsive pleading with the current deadline to

21

respond being July 31, 2017.

22

6.

The parties and their counsel wish to have sufficient time after the release

23

of protected records to continue with meaningful settlement discussions. Therefore, the

24

parties agree to an extension of time of sixty (60) days for defendants to file a responsive

25

pleading to the Complaint.

26

///

MITCHELL, BRISSO,
DELANEY & VRIEZE
814 Seventh Street
P.O. Drawer 1008
Eureka, CA 95502

__________________________________________2_____________________________________________

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS’ TIME FOR FILING RESPONSIVE
PLEADING

1

7.

Defendants have requested and Plaintiffs have agreed to provide an

2

additional extension of time to file a responsive pleading to the Complaint to September

3

29, 2017, in order to continue to discuss the prospect of an early resolution of this

4

matter.

5

THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE THAT:

6

1.

Defendants’ deadline to file pleadings in response to the Complaint on file

7

in this matter is extended until September 29, 2017.

8

IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED.

9

DATED: July 27, 2017

PALMER LAW GROUP

10
11

By:

12

/s/ William W. Palmer
WILLIAM W. PALMER
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

13
14

DATED: July 27, 2017

15

MITCHELL, BRISSO, DELANEY & VRIEZE, LLP

By:

16
17

/s/ Nicholas R. Kloeppel
NICHOLAS R. KLOEPPEL
Attorneys for Defendants

18
ORDER

19
20

The above stipulation is accepted and it is so ordered. Defendants DOUGLAS
SHAW, VICKY SLEIGHT, and GALASYN, INC. shall have an extension of time to

21
September 29, 2017, to file a responsive pleading to the Complaint.
22
23

DATED: July 31, 2017

24
25
26
MITCHELL, BRISSO,
DELANEY & VRIEZE
814 Seventh Street
P.O. Drawer 1008
Eureka, CA 95502

Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

__________________________________________3_____________________________________________

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS’ TIME FOR FILING RESPONSIVE
PLEADING