Galasyn et al v. Sleight et al

Filing 15

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 10/3/2017 EXTENDING time to 11/28/2017 for Defendants to file their responsive pleading to the complaint. (Donati, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Nicholas R. Kloeppel, SBN #186165 MITCHELL, BRISSO, DELANEY & VRIEZE, LLP Attorneys at Law 814 Seventh Street P. O. Drawer 1008 Eureka, CA 95502 Tel: (707) 443-5643 Fax: (707) 444-9586 Attorneys for Defendants DOUGLAS SHAW, VICKY SLEIGHT, GALASYN, INC. William W. Palmer, SBN #146404 PALMER LAW GROUP, PLC 2443 Fair Oaks Blvd., No. 545 Sacramento, CA 95825 Tel: (916) 972-0761 Fax: (916) 917-5397 Attorneys for Plaintiffs EDWARD GALASYN, MARTA A. KINGSBURY in her capacity as Administrator of the Estate of Edward Galasyn 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EDWARD GALASYN, MARTA A. CASE NO.: 17-cv-00363-TLN-EFB KINGSBURY in her capacity as Administrator of the Estate of STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS’ TIME FOR Edward Galasyn, FILING RESPONSIVE PLEADING Plaintiff, vs. VICKY SLEIGHT, DOUGLAS SHAW, GALASYN, INC., Defendants. 25 26 MITCHELL, BRISSO, DELANEY & VRIEZE 814 Seventh Street P.O. Drawer 1008 Eureka, CA 95502 __________________________________________1_____________________________________________ STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS’ TIME FOR FILING RESPONSIVE PLEADING 1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, plaintiffs 2 EDWARD GALASYN, MARTA A. KINGSBURY in her capacity as Administrator of 3 the Estate of Edward Galasyn (“Plaintiffs”), and defendants DOUGLAS SHAW, 4 VICKY SLEIGHT and GALASYN, INC. (“Defendants”), through their respective 5 attorneys as follows: 6 1. Plaintiffs filed an initial Complaint on February 21, 2017. 7 2. Defendants, who were served with the initial Complaint, are currently 8 required to respond to the Complaint on or before September 29, 2017, pursuant to this 9 court’s order filed on August 1, 2017, (ECF Docket No. 12). 10 3. The parties have exchanged relevant records and have engaged in 11 meaningful settlement discussions. Both parties have presented offers and believe that a 12 settlement is imminent. The most recent settlement offer was presented by defendants on 13 September 14, 2017. Plaintiffs are considering their response and have indicated that 14 they will need until September 27, 2017, to do so. Assuming that a settlement is not 15 reached, defendants would have insufficient time to prepare and file a first responsive 16 pleading by September 29, 2017. To ensure that there is an adequate opportunity to fully 17 explore early settlement and to afford defendants time to file their first responsive 18 pleading, the parties agree to extend the time for defendants to file their first responsive 19 pleading. 20 4. Defendants previously requested, and Plaintiffs agreed on four occasions, 21 to extend Defendants’ time to file a responsive pleading with the current deadline to 22 respond being September 29, 2017. 23 5. The parties and their counsel wish to have sufficient time respond to the 24 current settlement offer and attempt to reach a full agreement. Therefore, the parties 25 agree to an extension of time of sixty (60) days for defendants to file a responsive 26 pleading to the Complaint. MITCHELL, BRISSO, DELANEY & VRIEZE 814 Seventh Street P.O. Drawer 1008 Eureka, CA 95502 __________________________________________2_____________________________________________ STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS’ TIME FOR FILING RESPONSIVE PLEADING 1 6. Defendants have requested and Plaintiffs have agreed to provide an 2 additional extension of time to file a responsive pleading to the Complaint to November 3 28, 2017, in order to continue to discuss the prospect of an early resolution of this 4 matter. 5 THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE THAT: 6 1. Defendants’ deadline to file pleadings in response to the Complaint on file 7 in this matter is extended until November 28, 2017. 8 IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED. 9 DATED: September 21, 2017 PALMER LAW GROUP 10 By: 11 12 13 14 DATED: September 21, 2017 15 MITCHELL, BRISSO, DELANEY & VRIEZE, LLP By: 16 17 /s/ William W. Palmer WILLIAM W. PALMER Attorneys for Plaintiffs /s/ Nicholas R. Kloeppel NICHOLAS R. KLOEPPEL Attorneys for Defendants 18 19 20 21 22 23 ORDER The above stipulation is accepted and it is so ordered. Defendants DOUGLAS SHAW, VICKY SLEIGHT, and GALASYN, INC. shall have an extension of time to November 28, 2017, to file a responsive pleading to the Complaint. Dated: October 3, 2017 24 25 26 MITCHELL, BRISSO, DELANEY & VRIEZE 814 Seventh Street P.O. Drawer 1008 Eureka, CA 95502 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge __________________________________________3_____________________________________________ STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS’ TIME FOR FILING RESPONSIVE PLEADING

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?