Galasyn et al v. Sleight et al

Filing 7

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 05/30/17 ORDERING that the time for defendants Shaw, Sleight and Galasyn, Inc. to respond to the Complaint is Extended to 06/29/17. (Benson, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Nicholas R. Kloeppel, SBN #186165 MITCHELL, BRISSO, DELANEY & VRIEZE, LLP Attorneys at Law 814 Seventh Street P. O. Drawer 1008 Eureka, CA 95502 Tel: (707) 443-5643 Fax: (707) 444-9586 Attorneys for Defendants DOUGLAS SHAW, VICKY SLEIGHT, GALASYN, INC. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 William W. Palmer, SBN #146404 PALMER LAW GROUP, PLC 2443 Fair Oaks Blvd., No. 545 Sacramento, CA 95825 Tel: (916) 972-0761 Fax: (916) 917-5397 Attorneys for Plaintiffs EDWARD GALASYN, MARTA A. KINGSBURY in her capacity as Administrator of the Estate of Edward Galasyn 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EDWARD GALASYN, MARTA A. CASE NO.: 17-CV-00363-TLN-EFB KINGSBURY in her capacity as Administrator of the Estate of STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS’ TIME FOR Edward Galasyn, FILING RESPONSIVE PLEADING Plaintiff, vs. VICKY SLEIGHT, DOUGLAS SHAW, GALASYN, INC., 23 24 Defendants. 25 26 MITCHELL, BRISSO, DELANEY & VRIEZE 814 Seventh Street P.O. Drawer 1008 Eureka, CA 95502 ________________________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS’ TIME FOR FILING RESPONSIVE PLEADING 1 1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, plaintiffs EDWARD 2 GALASYN, MARTA A. KINGSBURY in her capacity as Administrator of the Estate of 3 Edward Galasyn (“Plaintiffs”), and defendants DOUGLAS SHAW, VICKY SLEIGHT 4 and GALASYN, INC. (“Defendants”), through their respective attorneys as follows: 5 1. Plaintiffs filed an initial Complaint on February 21, 2017. 6 2. Defendants, who were served with the initial Complaint, are required to 7 respond to the Complaint on or before May 29, 2017, pursuant to a stipulation filed with 8 the Court on April 28, 2017 (ECF Docket No. 5). 9 3. The parties are in the process of locating and informally exchanging 10 documents, and are evaluating the potential for early resolution of this case. The 11 attorneys are working well together and professionally in an effort to conserve the 12 resources of the Court and the parties. 13 4. Defendants have requested and Plaintiffs have agreed to provide an 14 additional extension of time to file a responsive pleading to the Complaint to June 29, 15 2017, in order to continue to discuss the prospect of an early resolution of this matter. 16 /// 17 /// 18 /// 19 /// 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// MITCHELL, BRISSO, DELANEY & VRIEZE 814 Seventh Street P.O. Drawer 1008 Eureka, CA 95502 ________________________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS’ TIME FOR FILING RESPONSIVE PLEADING 2 1 THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE THAT: 2 1. Defendants’ deadline to file pleadings in response to the Complaint on file 3 in this matter is extended until June 29, 2017. 4 IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED. 5 DATED: May 24, 2017 PALMER LAW GROUP 6 By: 7 8 9 DATED: May 24, 2017 /s/ William W. Palmer WILLIAM W. PALMER Attorneys for Plaintiffs MITCHELL, BRISSO, DELANEY & VRIEZE, LLP 10 11 By: 12 /s/ Nicholas R. Kloeppel NICHOLAS R. KLOEPPEL Attorneys for Defendants 13 14 ORDER 15 The above stipulation is accepted and it is so ordered. Defendants DOUGLAS 16 SHAW, VICKY SLEIGHT, and GALASYN, INC. shall have an extension of time to 17 June 29, 2017, to file a responsive pleading to the Complaint. 18 19 Dated: May 30, 2017 20 21 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 22 23 24 25 26 MITCHELL, BRISSO, DELANEY & VRIEZE 814 Seventh Street P.O. Drawer 1008 Eureka, CA 95502 ________________________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS’ TIME FOR FILING RESPONSIVE PLEADING 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?