Galasyn et al v. Sleight et al
Filing
7
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 05/30/17 ORDERING that the time for defendants Shaw, Sleight and Galasyn, Inc. to respond to the Complaint is Extended to 06/29/17. (Benson, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Nicholas R. Kloeppel, SBN #186165
MITCHELL, BRISSO, DELANEY & VRIEZE, LLP
Attorneys at Law
814 Seventh Street
P. O. Drawer 1008
Eureka, CA 95502
Tel: (707) 443-5643
Fax: (707) 444-9586
Attorneys for Defendants
DOUGLAS SHAW, VICKY SLEIGHT,
GALASYN, INC.
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
William W. Palmer, SBN #146404
PALMER LAW GROUP, PLC
2443 Fair Oaks Blvd., No. 545
Sacramento, CA 95825
Tel: (916) 972-0761
Fax: (916) 917-5397
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
EDWARD GALASYN, MARTA A.
KINGSBURY in her capacity as
Administrator of the Estate of
Edward Galasyn
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
EDWARD GALASYN, MARTA A.
CASE NO.: 17-CV-00363-TLN-EFB
KINGSBURY in her capacity as
Administrator of the Estate of
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND DEFENDANTS’ TIME FOR
Edward Galasyn,
FILING RESPONSIVE PLEADING
Plaintiff,
vs.
VICKY SLEIGHT, DOUGLAS SHAW,
GALASYN, INC.,
23
24
Defendants.
25
26
MITCHELL, BRISSO,
DELANEY & VRIEZE
814 Seventh Street
P.O. Drawer 1008
Eureka, CA 95502
________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS’ TIME FOR FILING
RESPONSIVE PLEADING
1
1
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, plaintiffs EDWARD
2
GALASYN, MARTA A. KINGSBURY in her capacity as Administrator of the Estate of
3
Edward Galasyn (“Plaintiffs”), and defendants DOUGLAS SHAW, VICKY SLEIGHT
4
and GALASYN, INC. (“Defendants”), through their respective attorneys as follows:
5
1.
Plaintiffs filed an initial Complaint on February 21, 2017.
6
2.
Defendants, who were served with the initial Complaint, are required to
7
respond to the Complaint on or before May 29, 2017, pursuant to a stipulation filed with
8
the Court on April 28, 2017 (ECF Docket No. 5).
9
3.
The parties are in the process of locating and informally exchanging
10
documents, and are evaluating the potential for early resolution of this case. The
11
attorneys are working well together and professionally in an effort to conserve the
12
resources of the Court and the parties.
13
4.
Defendants have requested and Plaintiffs have agreed to provide an
14
additional extension of time to file a responsive pleading to the Complaint to June 29,
15
2017, in order to continue to discuss the prospect of an early resolution of this matter.
16
///
17
///
18
///
19
///
20
///
21
///
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
MITCHELL, BRISSO,
DELANEY & VRIEZE
814 Seventh Street
P.O. Drawer 1008
Eureka, CA 95502
________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS’ TIME FOR FILING
RESPONSIVE PLEADING
2
1
THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE THAT:
2
1.
Defendants’ deadline to file pleadings in response to the Complaint on file
3
in this matter is extended until June 29, 2017.
4
IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED.
5
DATED: May 24, 2017
PALMER LAW GROUP
6
By:
7
8
9
DATED: May 24, 2017
/s/ William W. Palmer
WILLIAM W. PALMER
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
MITCHELL, BRISSO, DELANEY & VRIEZE, LLP
10
11
By:
12
/s/ Nicholas R. Kloeppel
NICHOLAS R. KLOEPPEL
Attorneys for Defendants
13
14
ORDER
15
The above stipulation is accepted and it is so ordered. Defendants DOUGLAS
16
SHAW, VICKY SLEIGHT, and GALASYN, INC. shall have an extension of time to
17
June 29, 2017, to file a responsive pleading to the Complaint.
18
19
Dated: May 30, 2017
20
21
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
22
23
24
25
26
MITCHELL, BRISSO,
DELANEY & VRIEZE
814 Seventh Street
P.O. Drawer 1008
Eureka, CA 95502
________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS’ TIME FOR FILING
RESPONSIVE PLEADING
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?