Willis v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Filing
21
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 11/20/2017 GRANTING 19 Request by William Idleman for JP Morgan Chase to appear telephonically at the motion hearing set for 11/27/2017 at 1:30 p.m. The courtroom deputy shall email counsel with instructions on how to participate in the telephone conference call.(Kirksey Smith, K)
JOHN M. SORICH (SBN 125223)
John.Sorich@piblaw.com
WILLIAM J. IDLEMAN (SBN 258450)
William.Idleman@piblaw.com
PARKER IBRAHIM & BERG LLC
695 Town Center Drive, 16th Floor
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Tel: (714) 361-9550
Fax: (714) 784-4190
Attorneys for Defendant,
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ELIZABETH A. WILLIS,
Plaintiff,
v.
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A and DOES 150 inclusive,
Defendant(s).
CASE NO.: 2:17-cv-00366-WBS-AC
Hon. William B. Shubb
ORDER ON DEFENDANT JPMORGAN
CHASE BANK, N.A.’S MOTION TO
ATTEND HEARING ON PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO REQUEST FOR RELIEF
UNDER FRCP, RULE 60, BY
TELEPHONE
Date:
November 27, 2017
Time: 1:30 p.m.
Crtrm: 5, 14th Floor
Action Filed: January 12, 2017
Removed: February 17, 2017
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
The Court, having reviewed defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.’s (“Defendant”) Motion
to Attend the hearing on plaintiff Elizabeth A. Willis’ Motion to Request for Relief Under FRCP,
Rule 60 (“Hearing”) by telephone (“Motion to Appear Telephonically”), and good cause appearing
therefore, hereby orders as follows:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Defendant may appear telephonically at the Hearing
currently set to be heard on November 27, 2017, at 1:30 p.m., before the Honorable District Court
Judge William B. Shubb of the above-entitled Court, by and through its counsel, William J. Idleman,
Parker Ibrahim & Berg LLC, (714) 361-9550.
The courtroom deputy shall email counsel with instructions on how to participate in the
telephone conference call.
Dated: November 20, 2017
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?