Willis v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Filing 21

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 11/20/2017 GRANTING 19 Request by William Idleman for JP Morgan Chase to appear telephonically at the motion hearing set for 11/27/2017 at 1:30 p.m. The courtroom deputy shall email counsel with instructions on how to participate in the telephone conference call.(Kirksey Smith, K)

Download PDF
JOHN M. SORICH (SBN 125223) John.Sorich@piblaw.com WILLIAM J. IDLEMAN (SBN 258450) William.Idleman@piblaw.com PARKER IBRAHIM & BERG LLC 695 Town Center Drive, 16th Floor Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Tel: (714) 361-9550 Fax: (714) 784-4190 Attorneys for Defendant, JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ELIZABETH A. WILLIS, Plaintiff, v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A and DOES 150 inclusive, Defendant(s). CASE NO.: 2:17-cv-00366-WBS-AC Hon. William B. Shubb ORDER ON DEFENDANT JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.’S MOTION TO ATTEND HEARING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REQUEST FOR RELIEF UNDER FRCP, RULE 60, BY TELEPHONE Date: November 27, 2017 Time: 1:30 p.m. Crtrm: 5, 14th Floor Action Filed: January 12, 2017 Removed: February 17, 2017 /// /// /// /// /// /// /// The Court, having reviewed defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.’s (“Defendant”) Motion to Attend the hearing on plaintiff Elizabeth A. Willis’ Motion to Request for Relief Under FRCP, Rule 60 (“Hearing”) by telephone (“Motion to Appear Telephonically”), and good cause appearing therefore, hereby orders as follows: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Defendant may appear telephonically at the Hearing currently set to be heard on November 27, 2017, at 1:30 p.m., before the Honorable District Court Judge William B. Shubb of the above-entitled Court, by and through its counsel, William J. Idleman, Parker Ibrahim & Berg LLC, (714) 361-9550. The courtroom deputy shall email counsel with instructions on how to participate in the telephone conference call. Dated: November 20, 2017

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?