Blank et al v. Sacramento Regional Transit et al

Filing 5

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 5/26/2017 ORDERING that the 4 findings and recommendations are ADOPTED. Paul Blank Apparel, Inc.'s claims asserted in the complaint are DISMISSED without leave to amend. (Zignago, K.)

1
2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4
5

PAUL LOUIS BLANK, et al.,

6

Plaintiff,

7
8
9

No. 2:17-cv-0371-JAM-KJN PS
ORDER

v.
SACRAMENTO REGIONAL TRANSIT,
et al.,
Defendants.

10
11

On April 20, 2017, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which

12
13

were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and

14

recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed.
Accordingly, the court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v.

15
16

United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are

17

reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.

18

1983).

19
20

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing,
concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in full.

21

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

22

1. The Proposed Findings and Recommendations filed April 20, 2017, are ADOPTED;

23

2.

24
25

Paul Blank Apparel, Inc.’s claims asserted in the complaint be dismissed without leave
to amend.

DATED: May 26, 2017

26

/s/ John A. Mendez_______________________

27

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

28
1