Blank et al v. Sacramento Regional Transit et al

Filing 5

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 5/26/2017 ORDERING that the 4 findings and recommendations are ADOPTED. Paul Blank Apparel, Inc.'s claims asserted in the complaint are DISMISSED without leave to amend. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 PAUL LOUIS BLANK, et al., 6 Plaintiff, 7 8 9 No. 2:17-cv-0371-JAM-KJN PS ORDER v. SACRAMENTO REGIONAL TRANSIT, et al., Defendants. 10 11 On April 20, 2017, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 12 13 were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 14 recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. Accordingly, the court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. 15 16 United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 17 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 18 1983). 19 20 The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in full. 21 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 22 1. The Proposed Findings and Recommendations filed April 20, 2017, are ADOPTED; 23 2. 24 25 Paul Blank Apparel, Inc.’s claims asserted in the complaint be dismissed without leave to amend. DATED: May 26, 2017 26 /s/ John A. Mendez_______________________ 27 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?