Takano et al v. The Procter & Gamble Company

Filing 19

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/6/2018 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that P & G's time to answer the Complaint shall be EXTENDED to 12/5/2018. (Reader, L)

1 REED SMITH LLP
Raymond A. Cardozo (State Bar No. 173263)
2 101 Second Street, Suite 1800
3 San Francisco, CA 94105-3659
Telephone: [phone]
4 Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
5 Facsimile: [phone]
Counsel for Defendant
6
7

BURSOR & FISHER, P.A.
L. Timothy Fisher (State Bar No. 191626)
Joel D. Smith (State Bar No. 244902)
Yeremey O. Krivoshey (State Bar No. 295032)
1990 North California Blvd., Suite 940
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Telephone: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
BURSOR & FISHER, P.A.
Scott A. Bursor (State Bar No. 276006)
888 Seventh Avenue
New York, NY 10019
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Counsel for Plaintiffs

8
9
10
11
12
13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18

TOM TAKANO and TRACY MCCARTHY,
Case No. 2:17-cv-00385 TLN-AC
on behalf of themselves and all others similarly
situated,
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER
EXTENDING DEFENDANT THE
Plaintiffs,
PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY’S
TIME TO ANSWER THE COMPLAINT
v.

19

THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY,

15
16
17

20
21

Judge: Hon. Troy L. Nunley

Defendant.
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Tom Takano and Tracy McCarthy (“Plaintiffs”) filed their Class

22 Action Complaint (“Complaint”) in this action on February 21, 2017.
23

WHEREAS, Defendant Procter & Gamble Company (“P&G”) filed a motion to dismiss on

24 March 29, 2017, which was ruled upon by this Court on October 24, 2018, and therefore the date by
25 which P&G must respond to the Complaint currently is set for November 7, 2018.
26

WHEREAS, in accordance with Local Rule 144, the Plaintiffs and P&G have agreed to

27 extend the time for P&G to answer the Complaint up to and including December 5, 2018, which is
28 28 days from the date that the answer is currently due and does not exceed the 28 days allowed
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT THE PROCTER & GAMBLE CO.’S TIME TO
ANSWER THE COMPLAINT

1 under Local Rule 144. This is the first extension of time to respond to the Complaint agreed to by
2 Plaintiffs and P&G.
3

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Plaintiffs and The

4 Procter & Gamble Co., through their respective counsel, that P&G’s time to answer the Complaint
5 shall be extended to December 5, 2018. Pursuant to Local Rule 144(a), approval of this stipulation
6 by the Court is not necessary.
7 Dated: November 2, 2018

REED SMITH LLP

8

By:

9

/s/ Raymond A. Cardozo
Raymond A. Cardozo

13

Raymond A. Cardozo (State Bar No. 173263)
101 Second Street, Suite 1800
San Francisco, CA 94105-3659
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail:
[e-mail]
Counsel for Defendant

14 Dated: November 2, 2018

BURSOR & FISHER, P.A.

15

By: /s Yeremey Krivoshey (as authorized on 10/30/2018
Yeremey Krivoshey

10
11
12

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

L. Timothy Fisher (State Bar No. 191626)
Joel D. Smith (State Bar No. 244902)
Yeremey O. Krivoshey (State Bar No. 295032)
1990 North California Blvd., Suite 940
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email:
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
BURSOR & FISHER, P.A.
Scott A. Bursor (State Bar No. 276006)
888 Seventh Avenue
New York, NY 10019
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail:
[e-mail]
Counsel for Plaintiffs

28
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT THE PROCTER & GAMBLE CO.’S TIME TO
ANSWER THE COMPLAINT

1
2
3

Dated: November 6, 2018
HONORABLE TROY L. NUNLEY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT THE PROCTER & GAMBLE CO.’S TIME TO
ANSWER THE COMPLAINT