Takano et al v. The Procter & Gamble Company

Filing 21

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/10/2018 ORDERING that P&G's deadline to answer the Complaint shall be EXTENDED to 1/2/2019. (Washington, S)

1 REED SMITH LLP
Raymond A. Cardozo (State Bar No. 173263)
2 101 Second Street, Suite 1800
San Francisco, CA 94105-3659
3
Telephone: [phone]
4 Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
5 Facsimile: [phone]
Counsel for Defendant
6
7

BURSOR & FISHER, P.A.
L. Timothy Fisher (State Bar No. 191626)
Joel D. Smith (State Bar No. 244902)
Yeremey O. Krivoshey (State Bar No. 295032)
1990 North California Blvd., Suite 940
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Telephone: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
BURSOR & FISHER, P.A.
Scott A. Bursor (State Bar No. 276006)
888 Seventh Avenue
New York, NY 10019
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Counsel for Plaintiffs

8
9
10
11
12
13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15

TOM TAKANO and TRACY MCCARTHY,
on behalf of themselves and all others
similarly situated,

Case No. 2:17-cv-00385 TLN-AC

18

v.

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER
EXTENDING THE PROCTER &
GAMBLE COMPANY’S TIME TO
ANSWER THE COMPLAINT

19

THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY,

Judge: Hon. Troy L. Nunley

16

Plaintiffs,

17

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

Defendant.
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Tom Takano and Tracy McCarthy (“Plaintiffs”) filed their Class
Action Complaint (“Complaint”) in this action on February 21, 2017.
WHEREAS, the Parties are in discussions to resolve this action.
WHEREAS, in accordance with Local Rule 144, the Plaintiffs and P&G have agreed to
extend the time for P&G to answer the Complaint up to and including January 2, 2019, which is
28 days from the date that the answer is currently due, December 5, 2018. This is the second
extension of time to respond to the Complaint agreed to by Plaintiffs and P&G. The previous

28
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT THE PROCTER & GAMBLE CO.’S TIME TO
ANSWER PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT
DMSLIBRARY01\33500237.v1

1 agreement of an extension extended the date that the answer was due from November 7, 2018 to
2 December 5, 2018.
3

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Plaintiffs and The

4 Procter & Gamble Co., through their respective counsel, that P&G’s time to answer the
5 Complaint shall be extended up to and including January 2, 2019. Pursuant to Local Rule
6 144(a), approval of this stipulation by the Court is necessary.
7 Dated: December 4, 2018

REED SMITH LLP

8

By:

9

/s/ Raymond A. Cardozo
Raymond A. Cardozo

12

Raymond A. Cardozo (State Bar No. 173263)
101 Second Street, Suite 1800
San Francisco, CA 94105-3659
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]

13

Counsel for Defendant

14 Dated: December 4, 2018

BURSOR & FISHER, P.A.

15

By:

10
11

16

/s/ Yeremey Krivoshey
Yeremey Krivoshey

L. Timothy Fisher (State Bar No. 191626)
Joel D. Smith (State Bar No. 244902)
Yeremey O. Krivoshey (State Bar No. 295032)
1990 North California Blvd., Suite 940
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email:
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

17
18
19
20
21
22
23

BURSOR & FISHER, P.A.
Scott A. Bursor (State Bar No. 276006)
888 Seventh Avenue
New York, NY 10019
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]

24
25
26
27

Counsel for Plaintiffs

28

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT THE PROCTER & GAMBLE CO.’S TIME TO
ANSWER PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT
DMSLIBRARY01\33500237.v1

1 SO ORDERED.
2
3 Dated: December 10, 2018
4
5
6

Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT THE PROCTER & GAMBLE CO.’S TIME TO
ANSWER PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT
DMSLIBRARY01\33500237.v1