Costamagna et al v. The Procter & Gamble Company et al

Filing 11

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 5/3/2017 ORDERING that Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint on or before Friday, 5/26/2017. (Zignago, K.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

John Quincy Brown III (SBN: 60681)
Stephen W. Robertson (SBN: 228708)
Hardy Erich Brown & Wilson
A Professional Law Corporation
1000 G Street, 2nd Floor
Sacramento, CA 95814
Tel: [phone]
[phone] [Fax]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant

9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

PENELOPE COSTAMAGNA and GARY
COSTAMAGNA,

Case No.: 2:17-cv-00409-MCE-EFB
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER
TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER OR
OTHERWISE RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO
EASTERN DISTRICT LOCAL RULE
144(a)

Plaintiff,
v.
THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY,
an Ohio Corporation, ASTRAZENECA
PHARMACEUTICALS LP, a Delaware
entity, and DOES 1 to 50, inclusive,
Defendants.

21
22
23
24

THE PARTIES HEREBY

STIPULATE AND

AGREE that Defendant

25

THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, an Ohio Corporation (“P&G”), may have

26

until May 26, 2017, to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint in order to

27

allow the parties time to determine if P&G should be dismissed from this action.

28

This extension does not exceed the twenty-eight (28) days allowed under
1
2:17-cv-00409-MCE-EFB

1

Eastern District Local Rule 144(a). This is the first stipulation for an extension of time

2

between the parties. Pursuant to Local Rule 144(a), approval of this stipulation by the

3

Court is not necessary.

4
5

Dated: May 1, 2017

By:

/s/ Stephen W. Robertson

6

HARDY ERICH BROWN & WILSON
Stephen W. Robertson (SBN 228708)
[e-mail]

7
8
9

Attorneys for Defendant

10
11
12
13

Dated: May 1, 2017

By:

/s/ Joshua H. Watson (as authorized on

14

5/1/17)

15

CLAYEO C. ARNOLD, APC
Joshua H. Watson (SBN 238058)
[e-mail]

16
17

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

18
19
20

ORDER

21
22
23

Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. Defendant should
answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint on or before Friday, May 26, 2017.

24
25

Dated: May 3, 2017

26
27
28
2
2:17-cv-00409-MCE-EFB

1

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

2
3
4
5
6

The Court’s CM/ECF system will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) to
the filing party, the assigned judge, and any registered users in the case. The NEF will
constitute service of the document(s). Registration as a CM/ECF user constitutes consent
to electronic service through the court’s transmission facilities. Under said practice, the
following CM/ECF users were served:

7
8

Clayeo C. Arnold (SBN 65070)
Joshua H. Watson (SBN 238058)
Clayeo C. Arnold, APC
865 Howe Avenue
Sacramento, California 95825
Email: [e-mail]

9
10
11
12

Attorneys for Plaintiff

13
14
15
16
17

On May 1, 2017, I served the foregoing JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER
TO

EXTEND

TIME

TO

ANSWER OR

OTHERWISE

RESPOND

TO

COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO EASTERN DISTRICT LOCAL RULE 144(a)
electronically through the CM/ECF system.

18
19

By: /s/ Crystal E. Holman

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
2:17-cv-00409-MCE-EFB