Horne v. Nissan North America, Inc.

Filing 31

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 1/10/2018 GRANTING an Extension of Time for the following deadlines: Fact Discovery due by 2/27/2018; Expert Witness Disclosure due by 4/30/2018; Rebuttal Expert Disclosure due by 5/30/2018; and Dispositive Motions due by 8/27/2018. The parties shall submit another proposed order reflecting the new discovery deadlines after the ruling on NNAs Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Transfer is issued. (Hunt, G)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 SHOOK, HARDY & BACON L.L.P. Amir Nassihi (SBN 235936) anassihi@shb.com One Montgomery, Suite 2700 San Francisco, California 94104-4505 Tel: 415.544.1900 | Fax: 415.391.0281 Attorneys for Defendant NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC. FINKELSTEIN & KRINSK LLP Jeffrey R. Krinsk (SBN 109234) jrk@classactionlaw.com Lauren R. Presser (SBN 292497) lrp@classactionlaw.com 550 West C. St., Suite 1760 San Diego, California 94101 Tel: 619.238.1333 | Fax: 619.238.5425 Attorneys for Plaintiffs JANELLE HORNE 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 15 JANELLE HORNE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 16 Plaintiffs, 17 18 19 Case No. 2:17-cv-00436-MCE-DB STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DISCOVERY CUT-OFF AND OTHER PRETRIAL DEADLINES v. NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC., NISSAN MOTOR CO., LTD. Defendants. 20 21 22 23 This Stipulation is entered into by and between Plaintiff Janelle Horne and Defendant Nissan 24 North America, Inc. (“NNA”) (collectively, the “Parties”),1 by and through their respective counsel, 25 with reference to the following facts and recitals: 26 27 1 28 represents NNA, not NML. Defendant Nissan Motor Co. Ltd. (“NML”) has not yet appeared and undersigned counsel solely STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DISCOVERY CUT-OFF CASE NO. 2:17-CV-00436-MCE-DB 396698 V1 1 2 1. Proceedings. (Dkt. 19); 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 On August 16, 2017, NNA filed its Motion to Transfer, or in the alternative, to Stay 2. Plaintiff filed her Oppositions to these motions on September 7, 2017. (Dkt. 21 and 3. On September 29, 2017, NNA filed its Reply Briefs in support of its Motions to 22); Dismiss and Transfer. (Dkt. 25 and 26); 4. On October 16, 2017, the court vacated the hearing date on NNA’s Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Transfer. (Dkt. 29) 5. The Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order (Dkt. 5) currently contemplates the following deadlines: Event Fact Discovery Cut-Off Expert Witness Disclosures Due Rebuttal Expert Disclosures Due Dispositive Motions Due 11 12 13 Current Deadline February 27, 2018 April 30, 2018 May 30, 2018 August 27, 2018 14 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective counsel, that 15 the deadlines set forth above shall be continued and shift to begin starting six months from the date 16 of the court’s rulings on NNA’s Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Transfer. 17 18 Dated: January 9, 2018 SHOOK, HARDY & BACON L.L.P. By: 19 20 /s/ Amir Nassihi___________ Amir Nassihi Attorneys for Defendant NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC. 21 22 23 Dated: January 9, 2018 FINKELSTEIN & KRINSK LLP By: /s/ Lauren R. Presser (as authorized on 1/9/18) Lauren R. Presser 24 25 Attorneys for Plaintiff JANELLE HORNE 26 27 2 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DISCOVERY CUT-OFF AND OTHER PRETRIAL DEADLINES CASE NO. 2:17-cv-00436-MCE-DB 396698 v1 1 ORDER 2 3 The parties’ above-referenced stipulation is hereby GRANTED. The parties shall submit 4 another proposed order reflecting the new discovery deadlines after the ruling on NNA’s Motion to 5 Dismiss and Motion to Transfer is issued. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 10, 2018 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 3 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DISCOVERY CUT-OFF AND OTHER PRETRIAL DEADLINES CASE NO. 2:17-cv-00436-MCE-DB 396698 v1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?