Foster v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 3

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 4/12/2017 DENYING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP; ORDERING the plaintiff to pay the filing fee or submit a completed Application for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis within 15 days. (Michel, G.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DIMITRIUS FOSTER, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:17-CV-0439-CMK vs. ORDER COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 15 Defendant. 16 / 17 18 Plaintiff, who is proceeding with retained counsel, brings this action under 19 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security. 20 Pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2). 21 The motion is incomplete. Specifically, in response to Question No. 2, plaintiff states that she is 22 not currently employed and, in response to Question No. 2(b) that she was last employed in 2009 23 by L.B. Construction in Roseville, California, but does not state the amount of her take-home 24 salary or wages for her last employer. Plaintiff will be provided an opportunity to either pay the 25 filing fees for this action or submit a completed application for leave to proceed in forma 26 pauperis. Plaintiff is cautioned that failure to comply with this order may result in dismissal of 1 1 the action. See Local Rule 110. 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 3 1. 4 5 6 Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2) is denied without prejudice; 2. Within 15 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall either pay the filing fees for this action or submit a completed application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. 7 8 9 10 DATED: April 12, 2017 ______________________________________ CRAIG M. KELLISON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?