Dalton v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 25

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/14/17 GRANTING Extension of time for Plaintiff to respond to Defendant's Cross Motion for Summary Judgment to 1/5/2018. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 LEGAL SERVICES OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA ANTONIO VALDEZ, SBN #288656 PATRICK TING, SBN # 301060 190 Reamer St. Auburn, CA 95603 Telephone: (530) 823-7560 Facsimile: (530) 823-7601 4 5 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff Stephanie E. Dalton, 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 STEPHANIE E. DALTON, 11 PLAINTIFF, 12 VS. 13 14 NANCY A. BERRYHILL, ACTING COMMISSIONEROF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION 15 DEFENDANT. 16 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 2:17-CV-00443-CKD STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME 19 20 IT IS STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of 21 record, that the time for Plaintiff to respond to Defendant’s Cross Motion for Summary 22 Judgment be extended until January 5, 2017. This is Plaintiff’s second request for an extension 23 of time to respond. Plaintiff’s counsel requires additional time to review and consider the 24 government’s position due to a heavy case load. Defendant’s counsel does not object and agrees 25 that all subsequent deadlines should be accordingly extended. 26 27 28 Respectfully submitted, 1 DATED: December 13, 2017 LEGAL SERVICES OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA /s/ Antonio Valdez________ _ By: ANTONIO VALDEZ Attorney for Plaintiff DATED: December 13, 2017 ___/s/ Michael K. Marriott* ___________ By: MICHAEL K. MARRIOTT Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant (* By e-mail authorization on 12/13/2017) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ORDER 10 APPROVED AND SO ORDERED. 11 Dated: December 14, 2017 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE _

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?