Bonner v. Medical Board of California

Filing 102

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 09/27/21 DENYING 82 Ex Parte Application. (Benson, A.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ERNEST LINCOLN BONNER, JR., M.D., 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 No. 2:17-cv-0445 KJM DB PS v. ORDER MEDICAL BOARD OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 On February 27, 2017, plaintiff commenced this action through counsel by filing a 19 complaint and paying the required filing fee. (ECF No. 1.) However, on November 30, 2020, the 20 assigned District Judge granted a motion terminating plaintiff’s counsel and staying this action. 21 (ECF No. 81.) On January 8, 2021, defendants filed an ex parte application for clarification of 22 the effects of the stay. (ECF No. 82.) On January 12, 2021, this matter was referred to the 23 undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). (ECF No. 83.) 24 On March 29, 2021, the undersigned issued a scheduling order. (ECF No. 91.) Because the stay in this action has been lifted and a scheduling order issue defendants’ ex 25 26 parte application will be denied. 27 //// 28 //// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants’ January 8, 2021 ex parte 2 application (ECF No. 82) is denied. 3 Dated: September 27, 2021 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 DLB:6 DB/orders/orders.pro se/bonner0445.clar.ord 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?