Bonner v. Medical Board of California
Filing
102
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 09/27/21 DENYING 82 Ex Parte Application. (Benson, A.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ERNEST LINCOLN BONNER, JR., M.D.,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
No. 2:17-cv-0445 KJM DB PS
v.
ORDER
MEDICAL BOARD OF CALIFORNIA, et
al.,
16
Defendants.
17
18
On February 27, 2017, plaintiff commenced this action through counsel by filing a
19
complaint and paying the required filing fee. (ECF No. 1.) However, on November 30, 2020, the
20
assigned District Judge granted a motion terminating plaintiff’s counsel and staying this action.
21
(ECF No. 81.) On January 8, 2021, defendants filed an ex parte application for clarification of
22
the effects of the stay. (ECF No. 82.) On January 12, 2021, this matter was referred to the
23
undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). (ECF No. 83.)
24
On March 29, 2021, the undersigned issued a scheduling order. (ECF No. 91.)
Because the stay in this action has been lifted and a scheduling order issue defendants’ ex
25
26
parte application will be denied.
27
////
28
////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants’ January 8, 2021 ex parte
2
application (ECF No. 82) is denied.
3
Dated: September 27, 2021
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
DLB:6
DB/orders/orders.pro se/bonner0445.clar.ord
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?