Ponce v. Baughman
Filing
5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 05/24/18 GRANTING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP. The clerk of the court is directed to randomly assign a District Judge and to update the docket to reflect the new case number. U.S. District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller is randomly assigned to this action. The new case number is 2:17-cv-450 KJM CMK (HC). (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CARLOS ESPARZA PONCE,
12
No. 2:17-cv-0450-CMK-P
Petitioner,
13
vs.
14
D. BAUGHMAN,
15
ORDER
Respondent.
/
16
17
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of
18
habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pending before the court is petitioner’s petition for
19
a writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1).
20
Petitioner seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Petitioner has submitted the
21
affidavit required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) showing that petitioner is unable to prepay fees and
22
costs or give security therefor. The request will be granted.
23
In addition, pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rules, this case was
24
not assigned to a District Judge when the case was filed. All parties have not consented to
25
Magistrate Judge jurisdiction and the court now finds that assignment of a District Judge is
26
necessary to properly address the case.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
Petitioner’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2) is
2.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to randomly assign a District Judge and
3
4
5
granted; and
to update the docket to reflect the new case number.
6
7
8
9
DATED: May 24, 2018
______________________________________
CRAIG M. KELLISON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?