McElroy v. CDCR, et al.

Filing 15

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 5/25/2017 DENYING 14 Renewed Motion to Proceed IFP; DENYING AS MOOT 10 Motion for Instantaneous Action and Motion for Sanctions and 13 Request for Hearing; and RECOMM ENDING that 1 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb. Within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. (Henshaw, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

LATWAHN MCELROY,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:17-cv-0485 WBS CKD P

Plaintiff,
v.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

CDCR, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff is a California prisoner proceeding pro se. On April 27, 2017, plaintiff was

18

ordered to pay the $400 filing fee for this action within 14 days. Plaintiff was warned that failure

19

to pay the filing fee within the allotted time would result in a recommendation that this action be

20

dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff has not paid the filing fee. Instead, plaintiff filed another

21

motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 14).

22

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that:

23

1. Plaintiff’s renewed motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 14) be denied for

24

the reasons stated in this court’s order dated April 27, 2017;

25

2. All other pending motions and requests be denied as moot (ECF No. 10, 13); and

26

3. This action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

27

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

28

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
1

1

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

2

with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings

3

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified

4

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153

5

(9th Cir. 1991).

6

Dated: May 25, 2017

_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

12/mcel0485.fifp.docx

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2