Sharma v. City of Redding
Filing
44
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 07/13/17 ORDERING that Plaintiff shall file Oppositions or Statements of Non-Opposition to the pending 35 and 36 motions within 7 days; defendant's reply brief, if any, shall be filed no later than 7 days thereafter; the 07/26/17 hearing is VACATED; defendant's 35 Motion to Dismiss and 36 and Motion to Strike will be submitted upon the record and briefs without oral argument. (Benson, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
NARENDRA SHARMA,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:17-cv-0487 MCE AC PS
v.
ORDER
CITY OF REDDING,
15
Defendant.
16
Plaintiff is proceeding pro per in this action. This proceeding was referred to the
17
18
undersigned by E.D. Cal. R. 302(c)(21).
19
The defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 35, and Motion to Strike Portions of
20
Plaintiff’s Complaint, ECF No. 36, are scheduled for hearing on July 26, 2017. However,
21
plaintiff has failed to timely file Oppositions or Statements of Non-Opposition to the motions, as
22
required by Local Rule 230 (c).
23
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
24
1.
Plaintiff shall file Oppositions or Statements of Non-Opposition to the pending
25
motions (ECF Nos. 35 and 36) no later than seven (7) days from the date of this
26
order. Plaintiff is cautioned that failure to comply may result in a
27
recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute.
28
////
1
1
2.
2
Defendant’s reply brief, if any, shall be filed no later than seven (7) days
thereafter.
3
3.
The hearing currently set for July 26, 2017 is VACATED.
4
4.
Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 35) and Motion to Strike
5
(ECF No. 36) will be submitted upon the record and briefs without oral argument,
6
pursuant to L.R. 230(g).
7
DATED: July 13, 2017
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?