J.M.B. et al v. Red Bluff Joint Union High School District
Filing
32
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/15/2017 ORDERING the complaint is conditionally DISMISSED without prejudice. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
DAN SIEGEL, SBN 56400
Email: danmsiegel@gmail.com
JANE BRUNNER, SBN 135422
Email: janebrunner@hotmail.com
EMILYROSE JOHNS, SBN 294319
Email: emilyrose@siegelyee.com
SIEGEL, YEE
475 14th Street, Suite 500 & BRUNNER
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: (510) 839-1200
ELIZABETH KRISTEN, SBN 218227
Email: ekristen@legalaidatwork.org
KIM TURNER, SBN 277520
Email: kturner@legalaidatwork.org
LEGAL AID AT WORK
180 Montgomery Street, Suite 600
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 864-8848
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
T.S. by and through their next friend
)
JERAMIE STRUTHERS; J.M.B. and J.E.B., )
by and through their next friend JAMES
)
BRANDT; E.A., by and through her next
)
friend HAZEL BRANDT; C.K. by and through )
her next friend TERESA HILL; and G.K. by )
and through her next friend LESLIANN
)
JONES and all others similarly situated,
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
RED BLUFF JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL )
DISTRICT,
)
)
Defendant.
)
Case No. 2:17-cv-00489-TNL-EFB
ORDER ENTERING SETTLEMENT
AGREEMENT, CONDITIONALLY
DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT
PREJUDICE, AND RETAINING
JURISDICTION
Order Entering Settlement Agreement, Conditionally Dismissing Action
Without Prejudice, and Retaining Jurisdiction
T.S., J.M.B., J.E.B., E.A., C.K., AND G.K. ET AL. v.
RED BLUFF JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT
Case No. 2:17-cv-00489-TNL-EFB
1
2
3
4
The Plaintiffs and the Defendant have entered into a Settlement Agreement and
Incorporated Statement of Commitment (“Agreement”) (Exhibit B).
ORDER that the Settlement Agreement and Incorporated Statement of Commitment
(Exhibit B) and all its terms are herein fully incorporated in this Order;
5
6
7
8
9
10
ORDER that the Court shall retain continuing jurisdiction over all of the terms in the
Agreement to enforce as provided in the Agreement;
ORDER that the Complaint is conditionally dismissed without prejudice, pursuant to Fed.
R. Civ. Proc. 41(a)(2);
ORDER that the Court shall issue a final judgment with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Civ. Proc. 54 and subject to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, on occurrence of one of the events representing
fulfillment of the Settlement Agreement as provided in Section F.7 of the Agreement;
ORDER that the Court retain jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 to enforce any
provision of the Agreement as provided for in Section F.7 of the Settlement Agreement;
ORDER that for all other purposes, this civil action is to be placed on the inactive docket,
subject to recall to the active docket, should enforcement of the Agreement be necessary.
IT IS SO ORDERED
Dated: November 15, 2017
21
22
23
24
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
25
26
27
28
Order Entering Settlement Agreement, Conditionally Dismissing Action
Without Prejudice, and Retaining Jurisdiction
T.S., J.M.B., J.E.B., E.A., C.K., AND G.K. ET AL. v.
RED BLUFF JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT
Case No. 2:17-cv-00489-TNL-EFB
1
Dated: November 13_, 2017
Respectfully submitted,
2
3
SIEGEL, YEE & BRUNNER
4
By
5
Jane Brunner, SBN 135422
Dan Siegel, SBN 56400
EmilyRose Johns, SBN 294319
6
/s/ Jane Brunner
7
8
9
10
11
LEGAL AID AT WORK
By /s/ Kim Turner
Elizabeth Kristen, SBN 218227
Kim Turner, 277520
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and
the Proposed Class
12
13
14
15
16
LEONE & ALBERTS
By /s/ Jimmie E. Johnson
Attorney’s for Defendant Red Bluff Joint
Union High School District
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Order Entering Settlement Agreement, Conditionally Dismissing Action
Without Prejudice, and Retaining Jurisdiction
T.S., J.M.B., J.E.B., E.A., C.K., AND G.K. ET AL. v.
RED BLUFF JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT
Case No. 2:17-cv-00489-TNL-EFB
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?