Sharp et al v. The United States

Filing 4

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 5/4/17. RECOMMENDING that this action be DISMISSED without prejudice. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Becknal, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

CALYSTA SHARP,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:17-cv-0492 JAM CKD PS

v.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THE UNITED STATES,

15

Defendant.

16
By order filed March 15, 2017, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave

17
18

to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff

19

has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

20
21

prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

22

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

23

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

24

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

25

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

26

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections

27

/////

28

/////
1

1

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v.

2

Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

3

Dated: May 4, 2017

_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

4
5
6

4 sharp0492.fta

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2