Garza v. CDCR Appeals et al
Filing
3
ORDER Transferring Case to the Sacramento Division, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 3/9/17. New Case Number 2:17-cv-00516-AC. Old Case Number 1:17-CV-00327. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
1:17-cv-00327-MJS (PC)
RAUL GARZA,
Plaintiff,
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE
SACRAMENTO DIVISION OF THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
v.
CDCR APPEALS, et al.,
15
Defendant.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant
18
to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28
19
U.S.C. ' 1915.
20
In his complaint, plaintiff alleges violations of his civil rights by defendants. The
21
alleged violations took place in Sacramento County, which is part of the Sacramento
22
Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California.
23
Therefore, the complaint should have been filed in the Sacramento Division.
24
Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in
25
the proper court may, on the court’s own motion, be transferred to the proper court.
26
Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Sacramento Division. This court will not
27
rule on plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis.
28
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1
1
2
3
4
1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of California sitting in Sacramento; and
2. All future filings shall refer to the new Sacramento case number assigned and
shall be filed at:
5
United States District Court
Eastern District of California
501 "I" Street, Suite 4-200
Sacramento, CA 95814
6
7
3. This court has not ruled on plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis.
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
11
Dated:
March 9, 2017
/s/
Michael J. Seng
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?