California River Watch v. City of Vacaville

Filing 83

ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/7/2020 WITHDRAWING 81 Bill of Costs. And EXTENDING the deadline for Defendant City of Vacaville to submit a bill of costs up to and including 8/18/2020. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

1 Gregory J. Newmark (SBN: 190488)
[e-mail]
2 Shiraz D. Tangri (SBN: 203037)
[e-mail]
3 Vidya Venugopal (SBN: 310172)
[e-mail]
4 MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER & WILSON
707 Wilshire Blvd., 24th Floor
5 Los Angeles, California 90017
Telephone: [phone]
6 Facsimile: [phone]
7 Attorneys for Defendant
CITY OF VACAVILLE
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO DIVISION

11
12 CALIFORNIA RIVER WATCH,

Case No. 2:17-cv-00524-KJM-KJN

13

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR BILL OF
COSTS

14

Plaintiff,
v.

15 CITY OF VACAVILLE,
16

Trial Date:

Vacated

Defendant.

17
18

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN ALL PARTIES AS

19 FOLLOWS:
20

Plaintiff California River Watch (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant City of Vacaville

21 (“Defendant” or “Vacaville”) (collectively, the “Parties”) by and through their respective attorneys
22 of record, hereby respectfully apply to this Court for an Order allowing Vacaville to withdraw its
23 current Bill of Costs and extending the deadline for Vacaville to submit its Bill of Costs.
RECITALS

24
25

WHEREAS, in compliance with Eastern District Local Rule 292(b), Vacaville filed its Bill

26 of Costs and supporting documentation on August 3, 2020 (Dkt No. 81), within 14 days of entry
27 of judgment or order (Dkt. No. 80);
28

WHEREAS, based on the Eastern District Local Rule 292(c), Plaintiff is required to file

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR COST BILL

1 specific objections to the costs claimed within seven (7) days from the date of service of the Bill of
2 Costs;
3

WHEREAS, the Parties are working towards a resolution with regard to costs claimed and

4 require additional time to discuss the issue;
5

WHEREAS, the Parties mutually believe it would be beneficial and efficient to resolve this

6 and avoid motion practice;
7

WHEREAS, the Parties agree that withdrawal of Vacaville’s Cost Bill and an extension of

8 the deadline to submit the Cost Bill up to and including August 18, 2020, would allow for this
9 resolution;
10

WHEREAS, the Parties agree that these facts constitute good cause for the requested

11 extension.
12
13

STIPULATION
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, between the Parties, subject to this

14 Court’s approval, that upon entry of the Court’s order on this stipulation, Vacaville’s Bill of Costs
15 will be withdrawn and the deadline for Vacaville to submit its Bill of Costs will be extended up to
16 and including August 18, 2020.
17
18 DATED: August 4, 2020

MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER & WILSON

19
20
21
22

By:

/s/ Gregory J. Newmark
GREGORY J. NEWMARK
Attorneys for Defendant
CITY OF VACAVILLE

23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR COST BILL

1 DATED: August 4, 2020

LAW OFFICES OF JACK SILVER

2
3

By:

4
5

/s/ Jack Silver
JACK SILVER
Attorneys for Plaintiff CALFORNIA RIVER
WATCH

6
7

DATED: August 4, 2020

LAW OFFICES OF DAVID J. WEINSOFF

8
9
10
11

By:

/s/ David J. Weinsoff
DAVID J. WEINSOFF
Attorneys for Plaintiff CALFORNIA RIVER
WATCH

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR COST BILL

1
2

ORDER
This Court, having received and reviewed the Stipulation of the Parties referenced

3 immediately above, and finding good cause therefore,
4

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

5

1.

Defendant City of Vacaville’s Bill of Costs (Dkt No. 81) is hereby withdrawn, and

6

2.

The deadline for Defendant City of Vacaville to submit a bill of costs is hereby

7 extended up to and including August 18, 2020.
8

IT IS SO ORDERED.

9 DATED: August 8, 2020.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR COST BILL