Tanksley v. Rio Cosumnes Correctional Center et al

Filing 5

ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 06/28/17 ORDERING the Clerk is directed to assign a District Judge to this case. U.S. District Judge John A. Mendez randomly assigned to this case. Also, RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed for failure to keep the court apprised of his current address. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

MOODY WOODROW TANKSLEY,

12
13
14
15
16

No. 2:17-cv-0566 CKD P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER and FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS

RIO CONSUMNES CORRECTIONAL
CENTER, et al.,
Defendants.

17
18

By an order filed March 21, 2017, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed in forma

19

pauperis application within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a

20

recommendation that this action be dismissed. However, that order was served on plaintiff’s

21

address of record and returned by the postal service. It appears that plaintiff has failed to comply

22

with Local Rule 183(b), which requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court

23

of any address change.

24

Accordingly, the Clerk is directed to assign a district judge to this case; and

25

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for plaintiff’s failure to

26

keep the court apprised of his current address. See Local Rules 183(b) and 110.

27

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

28

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
1

1

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

2

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings

3

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified

4

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153

5

(9th Cir. 1991).

6

Dated: June 28, 2017

_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

12/tank0566.fifp.33a

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2