Short v. Winnebago Industries, Inc. et al

Filing 21

STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/16/17. Initial disclosures shall becompleted by 8/24/2017. All discovery shall be completed by 10/2/2017. Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 10/9/2017, and re buttal disclosures due by 10/30/2017. All expert discovery shall be completed by 11/27/2017. All dispositive motions, except motions for continuances, temporary restrainingorders or other emergency applications, shall be heard no later than 12/8/2 017. The Final Pretrial Conference is SET for 3/23/2018 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. The parties shall confer and file a joint pretrial conference statement by 3/2/2018. The Jury Trial is SET for 5/7/2 018 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Trial briefs are due by 4/23/2018. This matter is REFERRED to the court's ADR Coordinator, Sujean Park, forthe convening of a VDRP session to take place in late October 2017. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RONALD SHORT, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 No. 2:17-cv-00571-KJM-AC v. STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) WINNEBAGO INDUSTRIES, INC. and STIER’S RV CENTER, LLC, ORDER Defendants. 16 17 18 An initial scheduling conference was held in this case on August 3, 2017. Terry 19 Baker and Ryan Gomez appeared for plaintiff; Thomas Murphy appeared for defendants. 20 Having reviewed the parties’ Joint Status Report filed on May 17, 2017, and 21 discussed a schedule for the case with counsel at the hearing, the court makes the following 22 orders: 23 I. SERVICE OF PROCESS 24 All named defendants have been served and no further service is permitted without 25 leave of court, good cause having been shown. 26 ///// 27 ///// 28 1 1 II. ADDITIONAL PARTIES/AMENDMENTS/PLEADINGS 2 No further joinder of parties or amendments to pleadings is permitted without 3 leave of court, good cause having been shown. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b); Johnson v. Mammoth 4 Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604 (9th Cir. 1992). 5 III. JURISDICTION/VENUE 6 Jurisdiction is predicated upon 15 U.S.C. § 1331. Jurisdiction and venue are not 7 disputed. 8 IV. DISCOVERY 9 Initial disclosures as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) shall be 10 completed by August 24, 2017. All discovery shall be completed by October 2, 2017. In this 11 context, “completed” means that all discovery shall have been conducted so that all depositions 12 have been taken and any disputes relative to discovery shall have been resolved by appropriate 13 order if necessary and, where discovery has been ordered, the order has been obeyed. All 14 motions to compel discovery must be noticed on the magistrate judge’s calendar in accordance 15 with the local rules of this court. While the assigned magistrate judge reviews proposed 16 discovery phase protective orders, requests to seal or redact are decided by Judge Mueller as 17 discussed in more detail below. In addition, while the assigned magistrate judge handles 18 discovery motions, the magistrate judge cannot change the schedule set in this order, except that 19 the magistrate judge may modify a discovery cutoff to the extent such modification does not have 20 the effect of requiring a change to the balance of the schedule. 21 V. 22 DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESSES All counsel are to designate in writing, file with the court, and serve upon all other 23 parties the name, address, and area of expertise of each expert that they propose to tender at trial 24 not later than October 9, 2017. The designation shall be accompanied by a written report 25 prepared and signed by the witness. The report shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B). 26 By October 30, 2017, any party who previously disclosed expert witnesses may submit a 27 supplemental list of expert witnesses who will express an opinion on a subject covered by an 28 expert designated by an adverse party, if the party supplementing an expert witness designation 2 1 has not previously retained an expert to testify on that subject. The supplemental designation 2 shall be accompanied by a written report, which shall also comply with the conditions stated 3 above. 4 Failure of a party to comply with the disclosure schedule as set forth above in all 5 likelihood will preclude that party from calling the expert witness at the time of trial. An expert 6 witness not appearing on the designation will not be permitted to testify unless the party offering 7 the witness demonstrates: (a) that the necessity for the witness could not have been reasonably 8 anticipated at the time the list was proffered; (b) that the court and opposing counsel were 9 promptly notified upon discovery of the witness; and (c) that the witness was promptly made 10 available for deposition. 11 For purposes of this scheduling order, an “expert” is any person who may be used 12 at trial to present evidence under Rules 702, 703 and 705 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, which 13 include both “percipient experts” (persons who, because of their expertise, have rendered expert 14 opinions in the normal course of their work duties or observations pertinent to the issues in the 15 case) and “retained experts” (persons specifically designated by a party to be a testifying expert 16 for the purposes of litigation). A party shall identify whether a disclosed expert is percipient, 17 retained, or both. It will be assumed that a party designating a retained expert has acquired the 18 express permission of the witness to be so listed. Parties designating percipient experts must state 19 in the designation who is responsible for arranging the deposition of such persons. 20 All experts designated are to be fully prepared at the time of designation to render 21 an informed opinion, and give the bases for their opinion, so that they will be able to give full and 22 complete testimony at any deposition taken by the opposing party. Experts will not be permitted 23 to testify at trial as to any information gathered or evaluated, or opinion formed, after deposition 24 taken subsequent to designation. All expert discovery shall be completed by November 27, 25 2017. 26 ///// 27 ///// 28 ///// 3 1 VI. MOTION HEARING SCHEDULE 2 All dispositive motions, except motions for continuances, temporary restraining 3 orders or other emergency applications, shall be heard no later than December 8, 2017.1 The 4 parties may obtain available hearing dates by checking Judge Mueller’s page on the court’s 5 website. 6 7 All purely legal issues are to be resolved by timely pretrial motions. Local Rule 230 governs the calendaring and procedures of civil motions; the following provisions also apply: 8 (a) The opposition and reply must be filed by 4:00 p.m. on the day due; and 9 (b) When the last day for filing an opposition brief falls on a legal holiday, the 10 opposition brief shall be filed on the last court day immediately preceding the legal holiday. 11 Failure to comply with Local Rule 230(c), as modified by this order, may be deemed consent to 12 the motion and the court may dispose of the motion summarily. Brydges v. Lewis, 18 F.3d 651, 13 652-53 (9th Cir. 1994). 14 The court values the importance of training young attorneys. The parties are 15 encouraged to consider assigning oral argument to a young attorney. If a written request for oral 16 argument is filed before a hearing, stating an attorney of four or fewer years out of law school 17 will argue the oral argument, then the court will ordinarily hold the hearing, although the court’s 18 schedule and calendar may require the hearing to be reset. Otherwise, the court may find it 19 appropriate in some actions to submit a motion without oral argument. 20 The court places a page limit of twenty (20) pages on all moving papers, twenty 21 (20) pages on oppositions, and ten (10) pages for replies. All requests for page limit increases 22 must be made in writing at least fourteen (14) days prior to the filing of the motion. 23 Prior to filing a motion in a case in which the parties are represented by counsel, 24 counsel shall engage in a pre-filing meet and confer to discuss thoroughly the substance of the 25 contemplated motion and any potential resolution. Plaintiff’s counsel should carefully evaluate 26 the defendant’s contentions as to deficiencies in the complaint and in many instances the party 27 28 1 Note that this date may not correspond to a law and motion calendar date. 4 1 considering a motion should agree to any amendment that would cure a curable defect. Counsel 2 should discuss the issues sufficiently so that if a motion of any kind is filed, including for 3 summary judgment, the briefing is directed only to those substantive issues requiring resolution 4 by the court. Counsel should resolve minor procedural or other non-substantive matters during 5 the meet and confer. A notice of motion shall contain a certification by counsel filing the 6 motion that meet and confer efforts have been exhausted, with a brief summary of meet and 7 confer efforts. 8 9 The parties are cautioned that failure to raise a dispositive legal issue that could have been tendered to the court by proper pretrial motion prior to the dispositive motion cut-off 10 date may constitute waiver of such issue. 11 VII. 12 SEALING No document will be sealed, nor shall a redacted document be filed, without the 13 prior approval of the court. If a document for which sealing or redaction is sought relates to the 14 record on a motion to be decided by Judge Mueller, the request to seal or redact should be 15 directed to her and not the assigned Magistrate Judge. All requests to seal or redact shall be 16 governed by Local Rules 141 (sealing) and 140 (redaction); protective orders covering the 17 discovery phase of litigation shall not govern the filing of sealed or redacted documents on the 18 public docket. The court will only consider requests to seal or redact filed by the proponent of 19 sealing or redaction. If a party plans to make a filing that includes material an opposing party has 20 identified as confidential and potentially subject to sealing, the filing party shall provide the 21 opposing party with sufficient notice in advance of filing to allow for the seeking of an order of 22 sealing or redaction from the court. 23 VIII. 24 FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE The Final Pretrial Conference is set for March 23, 2018,, at 10:00 a.m. At least 25 one of the attorneys who will conduct the trial for each of the parties shall attend the Final Pretrial 26 Conference. If by reason of illness or other unavoidable circumstance a trial attorney is unable to 27 attend, the attorney who attends in place of the trial attorney shall have equal familiarity with the 28 case and equal authorization to make commitments on behalf of the client. 5 1 Counsel for all parties are to be fully prepared for trial at the time of the Final 2 Pretrial Conference, with no matters remaining to be accomplished except production of 3 witnesses for oral testimony. The parties shall confer and file a joint pretrial conference 4 statement by March 2, 2018. The provisions of Local Rule 281 shall apply with respect to the 5 matters to be included in the joint pretrial statement. In addition to those subjects listed in Local 6 Rule 281(b), the parties are to provide the court with the following: 7 8 - A plain, concise statement that identifies every non-discovery motion previously tendered to the court and its resolution. 9 - A concise, joint list of undisputed core facts that are relevant to each claim. 10 Disputed core facts should then be identified in the same manner. The parties are reminded not to 11 identify every fact in dispute but only those disputed facts that are essential to the formulation of 12 each claim. Each disputed fact and undisputed fact should be separately numbered or lettered. 13 Where the parties are unable to agree on the core disputed facts, they should nevertheless list core 14 disputed facts in the above manner. 15 - Concise lists of disputed evidentiary issues that will be the subject of a party’s 16 motion in limine, and whether the parties believe resolution of any of these motions will be 17 necessary before the first day of trial. 18 - Each party’s points of law, which concisely describe the legal basis or theory 19 underlying their claims and defenses. Points of law should reflect issues derived from the core 20 undisputed and disputed facts. Parties shall not include argument with any point of law; the 21 parties may include concise arguments in their trial briefs. 22 - A joint statement of the case in plain concise language, which will be read to the 23 jury during voir dire and at the beginning of the trial. The purpose of the joint statement is to 24 inform the jury what the case is about. 25 - The parties’ position on the number of jurors to be impaneled to try the case. 26 Discovery documents to be listed in the pretrial statement shall not include 27 documents to be used only for impeachment and in rebuttal. 28 ///// 6 1 The parties are reminded that pursuant to Local Rule 281 they are required to 2 attach to the Final Pretrial Conference Statement an exhibit listing witnesses and exhibits they 3 propose to offer at trial. After the name of each witness, each party shall provide a brief 4 statement of the nature of the testimony to be proffered. The parties may file a joint list or each 5 party may file separate lists. These list(s) shall not be contained in the body of the Final Pretrial 6 Conference Statement itself, but shall be attached as separate documents to be used as addenda to 7 the Final Pretrial Order. 8 Plaintiff’s exhibits shall be listed numerically. Defendant’s exhibits shall be listed 9 alphabetically. The parties shall use the standard exhibit stickers provided by the court: pink for 10 plaintiff and blue for defendant. In the event that the alphabet is exhausted, the exhibits shall be 11 marked “AA-ZZ”. However, if the amount of defendant exhibits exceeds “ZZ” exhibits shall be 12 then listed as AAA, BBB, CCC etc. All multi-page exhibits shall be stapled or otherwise fastened 13 together and each page within the exhibit shall be numbered. The list of exhibits shall not include 14 excerpts of depositions to be used only for impeachment. In the event that plaintiff(s) and 15 defendant(s) offer the same exhibit during trial, that exhibit shall be referred to by the designation 16 the exhibit is first identified. The court cautions the parties to pay attention to this detail so that 17 all concerned, including the jury, will not be confused by one exhibit being identified with both a 18 number and a letter. The parties are encouraged to consult concerning exhibits and, to the extent 19 possible, provide joint exhibits, which shall be designated as JX and listed numerically, e.g., JX- 20 1, JX-2. 21 The Final Pretrial Order will contain a stringent standard for the offering at trial of 22 witnesses and exhibits not listed in the Final Pretrial Order, and the parties are cautioned that the 23 standard will be strictly applied. On the other hand, the listing of exhibits or witnesses that a 24 party does not intend to offer will be viewed as an abuse of the court’s processes. 25 26 Counsel shall produce all trial exhibits to Casey Schultz, the Courtroom Deputy, no later than 3:00 p.m. on the Friday before trial. 27 28 Failure to comply with Local Rule 281, as modified by this order, may be grounds for sanctions. 7 1 The parties also are reminded that pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of 2 Civil Procedure it will be their duty at the Final Pretrial Conference to aid the court in: (a) the 3 formulation and simplification of issues and the elimination of frivolous claims or defenses; 4 (b) the settling of facts that should properly be admitted; and (c) the avoidance of unnecessary 5 proof and cumulative evidence. Counsel must cooperatively prepare the joint Final Pretrial 6 Conference Statement and participate in good faith at the Final Pretrial Conference with these 7 aims in mind.2 A failure to do so may result in the imposition of sanctions which may include 8 monetary sanctions, orders precluding proof, elimination of claims or defenses, or such other 9 sanctions as the court deems appropriate. 10 Concurrently with the filing of the Joint Final Pretrial Conference Statement, 11 counsel shall submit to chambers the word processable version of the Statement, in its entirety 12 (including the witness and exhibit lists) to: 13 IX. MOTIONS IN LIMINE 14 All motions in limine must be filed in conjunction with the joint pretrial statement. 15 In most cases, motions in limine are addressed and resolved on the morning of the first day of 16 trial. As noted above, the parties may alert the court at the final pretrial conference and in their 17 final pretrial statement that a particular motion or motions should be resolved earlier. At the final 18 pretrial conference, the court will then set a briefing and hearing schedule on these motions in 19 limine as necessary. 20 The parties are reminded that a motion in limine is a pretrial procedural device 21 designed to address the admissibility of evidence. The court looks with disfavor upon 22 dispositional motions presented at the Final Pretrial Conference or at trial in the guise of motions 23 in limine. 24 ///// 25 ///// 26 2 27 28 “If the pretrial conference discloses that no material facts are in dispute and that the undisputed facts entitle one of the parties to judgment as a matter of law,” the court may summarily dispose of the case or claims. Portsmouth Square v. Shareholders Protective Comm., 770 F.2d 866, 86869 (9th Cir. 1985). 8 1 X. 2 TRIAL SETTING The jury trial is set for May 7, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. The parties estimate a trial 3 length of approximately four (4) to seven (7) days. Trial briefs are due by April 23, 2018. 4 XI. 5 SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE The parties have expressed interest in a settlement conference and are amenable to 6 a settlement conference convened by a member of the court’s Voluntary Dispute Resolution Panel 7 (VDRP). Accordingly, this matter is referred to the court’s ADR Coordinator, Sujean Park, for 8 the convening of a VDRP session to take place in late October 2017. A principal with full 9 settlement authority for each party shall appear at the VDRP session. 10 11 In the event no VDRP panelist is available during the time frame set forth above, the case will be referred to another judge of this court for settlement. 12 The parties are reminded to promptly notify the court if they settle this case prior 13 to the scheduled VDRP conference date. 14 XII. 15 MODIFICATION OF STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER The parties are reminded that pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil 16 Procedure, the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order shall not be modified except by leave of court 17 upon a showing of good cause. Agreement of the parties by stipulation alone does not constitute 18 good cause. Except in extraordinary circumstances, unavailability of witnesses or counsel does 19 not constitute good cause. 20 As noted, the assigned magistrate judge is authorized to modify only the discovery 21 dates shown above to the extent any such modification does not impact the balance of the 22 schedule of the case. 23 XIII. 24 25 26 27 OBJECTIONS TO STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER This Status Order will become final without further order of the court unless objections are filed within fourteen (14) calendar days of service of this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: August 16, 2017. 28 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?