Johnson v. Patel et al

Filing 48

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/22/2020 DENYING plaintiff's request that a bench warrant be issued for defendant. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SCOTT JOHNSON, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 No. 2:17-cv-00573-KJM-CKD v. ORDER HASMUKHBAI PATEL AND DAMYANTIBAN PATEL, Defendants. 16 On January 8, 2020, the court held a judgment-debtor examination in this matter. (ECF 17 18 No. 46.) Plaintiff appeared through counsel and defendants, who proceed without counsel, failed 19 to appear. (Id.) At the hearing plaintiff requested the court issue a bench warrant against defendant 20 21 Damyantiban Patel due to her failure to appear at multiple hearings. (Id.) The court took the 22 matter under submission, and asked plaintiff to provide authority for issuing a bench warrant in 23 similarly-situated cases. (Id.) Plaintiff did not provide the court with authority, but rather filed a 24 “proposed certification of facts of contempt” and a proposed order, neither of which cite to any 25 statute or case law. (See ECF No. 47.) After considering the nature of this case, the stage of litigation, and defendant’s pro se 26 27 status, the court declines to issue a bench warrant for defendant at this time. 28 //// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s request that a bench warrant be 2 issued for defendant is DENIED. 3 Dated: January 22, 2020 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 4 5 6 7 16/johnson.573 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?