Johnson v. Patel et al
Filing
48
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/22/2020 DENYING plaintiff's request that a bench warrant be issued for defendant. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
SCOTT JOHNSON,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
No. 2:17-cv-00573-KJM-CKD
v.
ORDER
HASMUKHBAI PATEL AND
DAMYANTIBAN PATEL,
Defendants.
16
On January 8, 2020, the court held a judgment-debtor examination in this matter. (ECF
17
18
No. 46.) Plaintiff appeared through counsel and defendants, who proceed without counsel, failed
19
to appear. (Id.)
At the hearing plaintiff requested the court issue a bench warrant against defendant
20
21
Damyantiban Patel due to her failure to appear at multiple hearings. (Id.) The court took the
22
matter under submission, and asked plaintiff to provide authority for issuing a bench warrant in
23
similarly-situated cases. (Id.) Plaintiff did not provide the court with authority, but rather filed a
24
“proposed certification of facts of contempt” and a proposed order, neither of which cite to any
25
statute or case law. (See ECF No. 47.)
After considering the nature of this case, the stage of litigation, and defendant’s pro se
26
27
status, the court declines to issue a bench warrant for defendant at this time.
28
////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s request that a bench warrant be
2
issued for defendant is DENIED.
3
Dated: January 22, 2020
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
4
5
6
7
16/johnson.573
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?